From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Chicken/egg problem building from a 'git clone' Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 07:45:12 -0500 Message-ID: <20090305124512.GA2723@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <49AF9601.9060709@op5.se> <43d8ce650903050337n48924fc3l89ef991d578f5849@mail.gmail.com> <20090305120602.GA18717@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: John Tapsell , Git Mailing List To: Matthieu Moy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 05 13:46:45 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LfCyL-0001tp-4w for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:46:45 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752345AbZCEMpR (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 07:45:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751858AbZCEMpR (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 07:45:17 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:56002 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751593AbZCEMpQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 07:45:16 -0500 Received: (qmail 30885 invoked by uid 107); 5 Mar 2009 12:45:15 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:45:15 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:45:12 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:38:27PM +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote: > >> * we have lots other files in git.git that are autogenerated (the > >> documentation files, for example) > > > > I'm not aware of any auto-generated files that are checked in. Can you > > give an example? > > man pages and html docs are commited, but in a separate branch. IOW, > Junio abuses Git as a distribution mechanism, but keeps it totally > separate from the actual sources. OK, true; but that is a totally different mechanism, unless the proposal is to autobuild a "this would be the release tarball" branch similar to html and man branches. -Peff