From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: (qmail 9967 invoked by uid 107); 10 Mar 2009 11:12:44 -0000 Received: from vger.kernel.org (HELO vger.kernel.org) (209.132.176.167) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:12:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754162AbZCJLMh (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:12:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753992AbZCJLMh (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:12:37 -0400 Received: from decibel.pvv.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.179]:41575 "EHLO decibel.pvv.ntnu.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753359AbZCJLMg (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:12:36 -0400 Received: from finnag by decibel.pvv.ntnu.no with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lgzsw-0006EP-8m; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:12:34 +0100 Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:12:34 +0100 From: Finn Arne Gangstad To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] git push usability improvements and default change Message-ID: <20090310111233.GA10036@pvv.org> References: <1236638151-6465-1-git-send-email-finnag@pvv.org> <20090310084615.GA11448@pvv.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:01:00PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Finn Arne Gangstad wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:35:12AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > At least without a proper way to prepare existing users for the end of > > > the world. > > > > That is pretty much what patches 4 and 5 are about - add nice warnings, > > but do not change behavior. 6 introduces the changed default. > > Ah, so you meant that 1-5 should be committed right away, and 6 in one > year? Yes, that was the intention. - Finn Arne