From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>,
Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>,
Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: setting up tracking on push
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:32:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090311063254.GA1324@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vwsaw7jzy.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:37:21PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> In any case, I find these "branch --retrack" proposals too confusing and
> probably overengineered.
I agree. I was hoping to find something that _wasn't_ confusing, but I
don't think we've succeeded.
> I need to ask a more fundamental question. Is it really useful for people
> to be able to re-track arbitrary remote/branch with an existing branch?
I do it occasionally, but I have never had a problem with editing
.git/config.
My use case is usually something like:
1. make an experimental commit on some long-running branch like 'next'
or 'master'
2. realize it's going to take several commits and would work better as
a topic branch
3. git checkout -b topic
in which case I have no tracking setup. But if I had realized it was
going to be a topic in the first place and done "git checkout -b topic
origin/master" then I would.
But again, I don't have a problem with editing .git/config. I was trying
in this thread to respond to user request.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-11 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-06 3:07 setting up tracking on push Miles Bader
2009-03-06 3:17 ` John Tapsell
2009-03-06 4:49 ` Jay Soffian
2009-03-06 10:45 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-06 11:15 ` Miles Bader
2009-03-06 14:15 ` Jeremy O'Brien
2009-03-06 15:43 ` Jay Soffian
2009-03-06 16:29 ` Miles Bader
2009-03-10 20:26 ` Marc Branchaud
2009-03-10 23:09 ` Jeff King
2009-03-11 1:52 ` Jay Soffian
2009-03-11 2:04 ` Jeff King
2009-03-11 2:59 ` Jay Soffian
2009-03-11 3:06 ` Jeff King
2009-03-11 3:40 ` Jay Soffian
2009-03-11 3:44 ` Jay Soffian
2009-03-11 3:57 ` Jeff King
2009-03-11 4:15 ` Jay Soffian
2009-03-24 9:58 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-03-11 4:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-11 4:56 ` Miles Bader
2009-03-11 5:03 ` Miles Bader
2009-03-11 5:22 ` Jay Soffian
2009-03-11 21:39 ` Marc Branchaud
2009-03-11 6:32 ` Jeff King [this message]
2009-03-11 10:02 ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-03-11 16:40 ` Jeff King
2009-03-12 0:08 ` John M. Dlugosz
2009-03-12 0:58 ` Jay Soffian
2009-03-12 1:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-12 1:16 ` Jay Soffian
2009-03-12 1:14 ` Jay Soffian
2009-03-12 1:21 ` Jay Soffian
2009-03-15 3:28 ` John M. Dlugosz
2009-03-15 12:36 ` Jay Soffian
2009-03-16 1:07 ` John M. Dlugosz
2009-03-16 1:43 ` Jay Soffian
2009-03-15 18:33 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090311063254.GA1324@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jaysoffian@gmail.com \
--cc=marcnarc@xiplink.com \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).