From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-push.txt: describe how to default to pushing only current branch Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:46:03 -0400 Message-ID: <20090314214603.GA20418@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20090313164941.GA16504@sigill.intra.peff.net> <1236994051-27346-1-git-send-email-chris_johnsen@pobox.com> <7vd4cjc3da.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20090313164941.GA16504@sigill.intra.peff.net> <1236994051-27346-1-git-send-email-chris_johnsen@pobox.com> <20090314203434.GA15444@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7veiwzajbc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Chris Johnsen , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Mar 14 22:48:46 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Libii-00086W-MB for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:48:41 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759937AbZCNVqI (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:46:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759926AbZCNVqG (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:46:06 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:45452 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759906AbZCNVqE (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:46:04 -0400 Received: (qmail 15358 invoked by uid 107); 14 Mar 2009 21:46:09 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:46:09 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:46:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7veiwzajbc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 02:25:11PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > > Actually, looking closer, the information seems to be lost entirely. > > Asciidoc renders this to in the XML, but docbook seems to > > throw it away when converting to a manpage. In theory it's possible to > > apply our own xsl style to turn this into something else, and I think > > that is a better solution than just trying to fix this one spot. > > When I check the asciidoc output for manpages (which I rarely do), I often > render it to Postscript to see the typesetting. I guess not many people > consider manpages are for printing anymore but are solely for monospaced > terminal consumption these days. How do you render it? From the XML, or from the roff? Because if I am reading it right (which it is entirely possible that I am not), the information is lost in the roff version. And that is the version I would expect people to be looking at (via man -Tps, or just plain man). -Peff