From: Allan Caffee <allan.caffee@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Autoconf: Disable inline for compilers that don't support it.
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:21:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090315152127.GA7988@linux.vnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vy6v7al37.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Allan Caffee <allan.caffee@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > The Autoconf macro AC_C_INLINE will redefine the inline keyword to whatever the
> > current compiler supports (including possibly nothing).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Allan Caffee <allan.caffee@gmail.com>
>
> As far as I can tell, this makes scriptlet to set ac_cv_c_inline and then
> the result is written to confdefs.h:
>
> case $ac_cv_c_inline in
> inline | yes) ;;
> *)
> case $ac_cv_c_inline in
> no) ac_val=;;
> *) ac_val=$ac_cv_c_inline;;
> esac
> cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
> #ifndef __cplusplus
> #define inline $ac_val
> #endif
> _ACEOF
> ;;
> esac
>
> which is used only during the ./configure run but not during the actual
> build.
>
> What am I missing?
My mistake; it looks like this macro will only work the way I described
when using a config.h, which I see git is not currently doing. I
assumed that it would also provide a -D flag to the precompiler if a
configuration header isn't used but this doesn't appear to be case (from
a cursory glance at the macros definition). I could send a patch that
would set up a config header, but that would mean adding an #include
directive to all of the source files (or at least those using inline).
OTOH doing so would allow git to make use of some other handy macros
like AC_C_CONST. Do you think this is worth adding a configuration
header?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-15 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-14 18:32 Compiler requirements for git? Corey Stup
2009-01-14 22:38 ` Miklos Vajna
2009-03-14 1:04 ` [PATCH] Autoconf: Disable inline for compilers that don't support it Allan Caffee
2009-03-14 20:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-15 15:21 ` Allan Caffee [this message]
2009-03-15 19:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-16 22:31 ` Allan Caffee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090315152127.GA7988@linux.vnet \
--to=allan.caffee@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).