From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nanako Shiraishi Subject: Local clone checks out wrong branch based on remote HEAD Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 06:31:23 +0900 Message-ID: <20090318063123.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Tom Preston-Werner X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 17 22:33:53 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ljgut-0000Na-W9 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:33:44 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755974AbZCQVcF (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:32:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755442AbZCQVcE (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:32:04 -0400 Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33]:35905 "EHLO karen.lavabit.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755507AbZCQVcC (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:32:02 -0400 Received: from c.earth.lavabit.com (c.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.12]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E059111B846; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:32:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 3365.lavabit.com (212.62.97.20) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id TF1F0N6KJZ7G; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:32:00 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=xoHRQ+qJEUJQ00FGCWx5NS8ry4Ozh47F/M4DyrgfWhqrbG+qJ46lh7dWWhSb6+dK6FiZwaMKPmoD0d7lBgrBRbNoTSQYa+KEP856ateru16m0z2ZX0VeBCQET/h6c3ktqYqnJhCaYFx+Z2wyqouos97CAibFLSQ9Sr4ENbSr3bc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id; In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Quoting Tom Preston-Werner : > I'm guessing that the first branch that matches the remote HEAD > revision is being checked out instead of the actual remote branch. I > would expect the correct branch to be chosen regardless of where the > branches are pointing. Isn't this a known issue that can be found out easily from the archive? http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/27259 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/101956/focus=101958 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/102039 If I remember correctly, the two patch series from Junio wasn't accepted warmly and they were dropped. -- Nanako Shiraishi http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/