From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robin Rosenberg Subject: Re: Suggested Workflow Question Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:52:53 +0100 Message-ID: <200903181452.53497.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> References: <46a038f90903172141o7b272c17v2c485bb66b529fe8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Roger Garvin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 18 14:55:06 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LjwEQ-0003Vh-3r for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:54:54 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751184AbZCRNxH (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:53:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754632AbZCRNxF (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:53:05 -0400 Received: from mail.dewire.com ([83.140.172.130]:26461 "EHLO dewire.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754617AbZCRNxE (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:53:04 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dewire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5742139137A; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:52:55 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at dewire.com Received: from dewire.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (torino.dewire.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fLVBrwJ17kFu; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:52:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from sleipner.localnet (unknown [10.9.0.4]) by dewire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD328138AD53; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:52:54 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.27-12-generic; KDE/4.2.1; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: onsdag 18 mars 2009 14:00:51 skrev Roger Garvin : > Martin Langhoff gmail.com> writes: > > > We've done a ton of that. Even better than emailing is that you can > > have a repo on a usb stick/disk. > > > > That would be great except that most of our customers do not technically allow > us to plug USB drives into any of their computers. It's a rather silly rule > actually but the drives could be confiscated. > > Thank you for the links to the other thread. I will read through those today. > I am hoping that this is simpler in practice than it looks on paper, cause what > I see on paper is a fully connected graph of all our employees with all our > customers multiple source locations and with our office server. It seems like > it could get out of control for tracking where changes might be (who is holding > them) Don't forget the option of mailing bundles (man git-bundle). Those will give the effect of push/fetch via e-mail. I.e. the exact same commit SHA's get replicated, That may be relevant for the branches that contain your released/official test code. -- robin