From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robin Rosenberg Subject: Re: [EGIT RFC PATCH(was Re: egit problem with sym linked eclipse project dirs)] Add some support for symlinked projects. Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:10:34 +0100 Message-ID: <200903182210.35096.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> References: <200903120756.07853.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , git@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Bannasch X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 18 22:12:36 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lk33h-0006gE-JK for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:12:18 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755000AbZCRVKl (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:10:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754516AbZCRVKk (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:10:40 -0400 Received: from mail.dewire.com ([83.140.172.130]:29790 "EHLO dewire.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754172AbZCRVKj (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:10:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dewire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249F41391388; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:10:37 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at dewire.com Received: from dewire.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (torino.dewire.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZyJ629Gu65St; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:10:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from sleipner.localnet (unknown [10.9.0.16]) by dewire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9A9139137A; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:10:36 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.27-12-generic; KDE/4.2.1; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: onsdag 18 mars 2009 17:02:15 skrev Stephen Bannasch : > In figuring this out I ended up testing the original problem with the > master branch from earlier today and didn't see the issue I > originally reported. > > Did you already integrate the experimental patch? No, so maybe you are running the plugin + the experimental patch anyway. -- robim