From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn O. Pearce" Subject: Re: Gnome chose Git Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:53:31 -0700 Message-ID: <20090319215331.GW23521@spearce.org> References: <1cd1989b0903190643p19a40718yc4fd2730aab0a9a0@mail.gmail.com> <49C24D9B.1060301@drmicha.warpmail.net> <1cd1989b0903190701uac4602dl1d2c3cace45a9938@mail.gmail.com> <20090319151610.GO23521@spearce.org> <1cd1989b0903190850p1a08991y754904e7799c7879@mail.gmail.com> <20090319201405.GD17028@coredump.intra.peff.net> <9b18b3110903191440w20ca9801pfb218cc4b10ea769@mail.gmail.com> <20090319214317.GU23521@spearce.org> <20090319214432.GV23521@spearce.org> <9b18b3110903191451u56bbee7biac3a1fee4a36b71d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff King , Git To: demerphq X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 19 22:55:14 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LkQCe-0008Im-NL for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:55:05 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757276AbZCSVxf (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:53:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756244AbZCSVxe (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:53:34 -0400 Received: from george.spearce.org ([209.20.77.23]:58628 "EHLO george.spearce.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754143AbZCSVxd (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:53:33 -0400 Received: by george.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0789438221; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9b18b3110903191451u56bbee7biac3a1fee4a36b71d@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: demerphq wrote: > 2009/3/19 Shawn O. Pearce : > > "Shawn O. Pearce" wrote: > > > > git log -g branch@{now} > > Ah! Much nicer! Thanks. > > Is there by any chance any way to set the date format it uses to > something more suitable for machine processing? I don't think so. If you want to machine process it, why not just read the reflog directly? Its a really simple format. -- Shawn.