From: Michael Hendricks <michael@ndrix.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] format-patch: add arbitrary email headers
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:42:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090326164212.GF29569@ginosko.ndrix.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v3ad11kqh.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:11:02PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael Hendricks <michael@ndrix.org> writes:
>
> > format-patch supports the format.headers configuration for adding
> > arbitrary email headers to the patches it outputs. This patch adds
> > support for a --header argument which makes the same feature available
> > from the command line. This is useful when the content of custom
> > email headers must change from branch to branch.
>
> How should this interact with the configuration variable?
>
> Typically we allow command line options to override the matching config
> variable, so that people can say "here are the settings I ordinarily use"
> in the config file, and say "but I do not want the usual values to take
> effect for this particular invocation; please use these _instead_" with
> command line options.
>
> Note that the above question is "how should this interact"; not "how does
> this interact". I can see you chose to make this cumulative in your patch
> and the documentaiton.
>
> I am asking if that is what the users want, overriding is preferred, or
> perhaps another option to clear extra headers (say, "--no-extra-headers")
> is necessary to allow both.
In all the cases where I use custom headers on patch emails, I want
the command line headers to be cumulative with the config headers. I
only configure headers which are constant (such as "X-Project:
project-name"). The ones that vary have no reasonable default value
since they typically represent a bug tracking number or something
similar.
Perhaps --add-header is a better name for this argument. That name at
least makes it clear that headers specified on the command line are
cumulative. If someone has a use case for --no-extra-headers, they
can add it later and --add-header retains the same meaning.
Follow-up patch coming shortly.
--
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-26 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-25 15:58 [PATCH] format-patch: add arbitrary email headers Michael Hendricks
2009-03-25 19:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-26 16:42 ` Michael Hendricks [this message]
2009-03-26 16:51 ` Michael Hendricks
2009-03-26 20:29 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090326164212.GF29569@ginosko.ndrix.org \
--to=michael@ndrix.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).