From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Header includes cleanup Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:24:01 -0400 Message-ID: <20090403122401.GA21153@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <1238406925-15907-1-git-send-email-nathaniel.dawson@gmail.com> <7v8wmjk4p6.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20090402112705.GD14599@sigill.intra.peff.net> <200904030614.26310.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Nathaniel P Dawson , Johannes Sixt , git@vger.kernel.org To: Christian Couder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 03 14:26:48 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LpiTl-0005rZ-GL for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:26:37 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760796AbZDCMYT (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:24:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752559AbZDCMYS (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:24:18 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:34326 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760375AbZDCMYS (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:24:18 -0400 Received: (qmail 31438 invoked by uid 107); 3 Apr 2009 12:24:34 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:24:34 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:24:01 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200904030614.26310.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 06:14:26AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote: > > So I don't know if it is worth it. > > I am not sure what you are talking about here, but if you mean that you > don't think it's worth splitting gigantic .h files (like cache.h) into > smaller logical units, then I agree. What I meant was "there is a tradeoff between faster compilation times and potentially more programmer effort, and I don't know if that tradeoff is worth it". So I think you understood what I was saying, and I think your point is reasonable. -Peff