From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Sebrecht Subject: Re: Performance issue: initial git clone causes massive repack Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 06:08:31 +0200 Message-ID: <20090405040831.GA18892@vidovic> References: <20090404220743.GA869@curie-int> <20090405000536.GA12927@vidovic> <20090405T001239Z@curie.orbis-terrarum.net> <20090405035453.GB12927@vidovic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Robin H. Johnson" , Git Mailing List To: Nicolas Sebrecht X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Apr 05 06:13:40 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LqJjm-00014i-SI for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 06:13:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758401AbZDEEIl (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Apr 2009 00:08:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758633AbZDEEIk (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Apr 2009 00:08:40 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f165.google.com ([209.85.219.165]:60984 "EHLO mail-ew0-f165.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758623AbZDEEIj (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Apr 2009 00:08:39 -0400 Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so1470440ewy.37 for ; Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:08:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=93nTMIJbJATuYIH46iEkamB/6DDhS8QZwbO1E4i9Vqc=; b=izO7eHL8tvra87TICuZEdptaiRxdglrJaCSySKzvhuy5PrAi1+XsoQxxT0FB9wXVbA tQMnin9kwp30++OstqIr8wxM6JDu6ak7V4qPaQk7aIVunUubWf0EFs5IiaNH7cU5Ls+c U2Nnc/2H/Q25BfI84eaw5AvPLlnlZtxpFpG6M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=CKOLMDqIrWWY/OQRbKQCxbTifafWiEDRUioNCFI5IU2VCgiVDMV82B7B2OxSee6yY3 HTGdTec1TnFLFJmsTy/vHczicDrOBDNMNyidnxMb01iYPaPJSyLnJuuHoxGZr+1qYtxF qtsycachf+NKzyX+PgI2qvInYkjjEs4ust1NQ= Received: by 10.210.21.6 with SMTP id 6mr2202341ebu.90.1238904515671; Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from @ (ABordeaux-258-1-82-86.w86-201.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.201.73.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm5003637eyb.40.2009.04.04.21.08.33 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:08:34 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090405035453.GB12927@vidovic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 05:54:53AM +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > One repo per category could be a good compromise assuming one seperate > branch per ebuild, then. s/ebuild/package/ -- Nicolas Sebrecht