git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
To: Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@gmail.com>
Cc: Ferry Huberts <ferry.huberts@pelagic.nl>,
	"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [EGIT PATCH] Add support for writing/appending .gitignore file
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:09:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200904201909.38766.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D1840C4-B04C-4D75-9A01-BDCDC40D0A29@gmail.com>

måndag 20 april 2009 09:55:54 skrev Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@gmail.com>:
> 
> On 20 Apr 2009, at 07:32, Robin Rosenberg wrote:
> 
> > måndag 20 april 2009 04:40:42 skrev Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@gmail.com 
> > >:
> >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Robin Rosenberg
> >> <robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> wrote:
> >> One advantage of attaching issues is you don't have MUA problems :-)
> >> I'll try and get a patch to work via git-send-email later.
> >
> > The problem is review. With e-mail I can just hit reply and comment  
> > on your
> > patch. Did your try the SMTP interface to gmail? I think e-mailing  
> > inlined patches is
> > a nearly perfect. Inline-attachment is ok with me. That makes it  
> > possible to
> > comment on them like any email in my mail program.
> 
> Right, but the same approach is possible in a bug tracking system -  
> just comment. And people get a notification that a change has  
I haven't seen that. Obviously a bugtracker could cite the patch, but
I don't know any that do.

> apple:egit alex$ git status
> # On branch master
> # Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 9 commits.
> #
> nothing to commit (working directory clean)
> 
> apple:egit alex$ git rebase -i origin/master
> Working tree is dirty
> apple:egit alex$ git rebase -i d0fd6f96b9311b972c6bffa8680544607d7e3c56
> Working tree is dirty
> apple:egit alex$
> 
> I'm probably doing something obviously wrong here, but I don't know  
> how to understand the difference between 'working tree is dirty' and  
> 'working directory clean', especially since git status (or git commit - 
> a) doesn't show any differences.

"obviously" isn't the right word here, or status and rebase would agree
on the cleanliness. If you are using bash I strong suggest you enable
the nice bash prompt with some status information. It's in <gIt>/contrib/completion
if you have the Git source. In a packaged version  you can probably can
source /etc/bash_completion. It will tell you what branch you are on and
state-information, like whether a rebase is in progress or not (you would
get a different message from rebase/status if that was the case).

> Please excuse me whilst I figure out how to get comfortable working  
> with git ...

It took me only ten minutes to find a bug the first time I used git :)

-- robin

      reply	other threads:[~2009-04-20 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-19 13:09 [EGIT PATCH] Add support for writing/appending .gitignore file Alex Blewitt
2009-04-19 21:50 ` Robin Rosenberg
2009-04-20  2:40   ` Alex Blewitt
2009-04-20  6:32     ` Robin Rosenberg
2009-04-20  7:55       ` Alex Blewitt
2009-04-20 17:09         ` Robin Rosenberg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200904201909.38766.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com \
    --to=robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com \
    --cc=alex.blewitt@gmail.com \
    --cc=ferry.huberts@pelagic.nl \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=spearce@spearce.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).