From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] Removed redundant static functions such as update_tracking_ref() and verify_remote_names() from builtin-send-pack.c, and made the ones in transport.c not be static so they can be used instead. Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:09:46 -0400 Message-ID: <20090429040946.GC14912@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <1240546432-26212-1-git-send-email-andy@petdance.com> <20090424210418.GC13561@coredump.intra.peff.net> <99B4BF12-01B9-4A68-B2E0-EF5DF2595FF0@petdance.com> <4B2541E8-7A27-45D5-B77D-AE93C0430EA8@petdance.com> <49F5C377.9010200@vilain.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Andy Lester , Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com To: Sam Vilain X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 29 06:09:57 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lz17M-0002uF-Ol for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:09:57 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751724AbZD2EJt (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:09:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751541AbZD2EJt (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:09:49 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:59463 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751396AbZD2EJs (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:09:48 -0400 Received: (qmail 2615 invoked by uid 107); 29 Apr 2009 04:10:01 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:10:01 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:09:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49F5C377.9010200@vilain.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 02:38:47AM +1200, Sam Vilain wrote: > Subject: [PATCH] SubmittingPatches: itemize and reflect upon well written changes > > The SubmittingPatches file was trimmed down from a somewhat > overwhelming set of requirements from the Linux Kernel equivalent; > however perhaps a little of it can be returned without making the > text too long. This is an improvement, IMHO (and much less verbose than what I wrote to Andy earlier). -Peff