git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Sitaram Chamarty <sitaramc@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (topgit question) deleting a dependency
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:48:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090429184851.GA17286@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <slrngvgh7m.isk.sitaramc@sitaramc.homelinux.net>

Hello,

> >> This is a little beyond my comprehension :(  However, this
> >> is also why I am limiting myself to
> >> 
> >>   - a single level of dependencies in tg, (master -->
> >>     multiple t/something --> t/all), and
> >> 
> >>   - no changes of its own in t/all
> >> 
> >> When any of the t/something graduates to master, t/all will
> >> be blown away (safe, since it has no changes of its own) and
> 
> > What makes you think it will "be blown away"?  Or alternatively, what do
> 
> My mistake.  I meant that I will blow it away myself, and
> create a new one with the same name except it's list of deps
> will exclude the one that graduated.
> 
> > you mean saying that?  I often use the same approach and I never had the
> > feeling anything is blown away.  If upstream uses your t/something patch
> > it just merges into t/something making it empty without changing the
> 
> How?  When I update master from upstream and then tg update
> on t/all?
yes.  I think it's even save to just remove empty dependencies (and add
the dependencies of the patch branch to be deleted) from .topdeps.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                              | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                    | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

      reply	other threads:[~2009-04-29 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-28  8:49 (topgit question) deleting a dependency Sitaram Chamarty
2009-04-28  9:41 ` martin f krafft
2009-04-28 14:12   ` Sitaram Chamarty
2009-04-28 15:07     ` martin f krafft
2009-04-28 15:41       ` Sitaram Chamarty
2009-04-28 20:40   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-04-29  0:52     ` Sitaram Chamarty
2009-04-29  8:24       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-04-29 12:15         ` Sitaram Chamarty
2009-04-29 18:48           ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090429184851.GA17286@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sitaramc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).