From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] git-am.txt: Use date instead of time or timestamp Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 03:25:23 -0400 Message-ID: <20090504072523.GA12759@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <1241419618-20304-1-git-send-email-bebarino@gmail.com> <1241419618-20304-2-git-send-email-bebarino@gmail.com> <1241419618-20304-3-git-send-email-bebarino@gmail.com> <20090504071534.GB12654@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vprep49h3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Stephen Boyd , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 04 09:25:37 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M0sYS-0007vd-Aq for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 09:25:36 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753107AbZEDHZ0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 03:25:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752854AbZEDHZZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 03:25:25 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:49674 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752554AbZEDHZZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 03:25:25 -0400 Received: (qmail 16681 invoked by uid 107); 4 May 2009 07:25:41 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Mon, 04 May 2009 03:25:41 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 04 May 2009 03:25:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vprep49h3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 12:23:52AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> commit creation as the committer date. This allows the > >> - user to lie about author timestamp by using the same > >> + user to lie about the author date by using the same > >> timestamp as the committer date. > > > > But you leave the "timestamp" in the next context line? > > > > The other two patches in the series look fine to me, though. > > Likewise. Perhaps "using the same value as the committer date" sounds > better? Much better IMHO. -Peff