From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fredrik Skolmli Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Clarify which paths git-clean will affect Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 12:05:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20090505100506.GF27900@frsk.net> References: <20090505091302.GB27900@frsk.net> <200905051155.28985.trast@student.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Thomas Rast X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 05 12:05:27 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M1HWg-0005I5-3k for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 12:05:26 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754244AbZEEKFN (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2009 06:05:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753975AbZEEKFM (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2009 06:05:12 -0400 Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no ([129.241.93.19]:58880 "EHLO cassarossa.samfundet.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752007AbZEEKFL (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2009 06:05:11 -0400 Received: from asterix.samfundet.no ([2001:700:300:1800::f] helo=asterix.frsk.net) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1M1HWN-0002p7-A8; Tue, 05 May 2009 12:05:07 +0200 Received: from fredrik by asterix.frsk.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M1HWN-0000is-2c; Tue, 05 May 2009 12:05:07 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200905051155.28985.trast@student.ethz.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:55:17AM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote: > Fredrik Skolmli wrote: > > --- a/Documentation/git-clean.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/git-clean.txt > > @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ example, be useful to remove all build products. > > If any optional `...` arguments are given, only those paths > > are affected. > > > > +If no arguments are given, the cleaning is recursive, starting at the current > > +path. > > That makes it sound as if the case was not recursive, but it > is! Auch, good point. Any suggestions on how to formulate it? -- Fredrik Skolmli