From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn O. Pearce" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow monitor/unintersting objects to be null Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 13:02:35 -0700 Message-ID: <20090506200235.GI30527@spearce.org> References: <1241639836-6719-1-git-send-email-alex.blewitt@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: robin.rosenberg@dewire.com, git@vger.kernel.org To: Alex Blewitt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 06 22:03:14 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M1nKT-0003oT-QW for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 22:02:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755544AbZEFUCf (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 16:02:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755325AbZEFUCf (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 16:02:35 -0400 Received: from george.spearce.org ([209.20.77.23]:60995 "EHLO george.spearce.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755099AbZEFUCe (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 16:02:34 -0400 Received: by george.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 13B6A381CE; Wed, 6 May 2009 20:02:35 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1241639836-6719-1-git-send-email-alex.blewitt@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Alex Blewitt wrote: > --- > .../src/org/spearce/jgit/lib/PackWriter.java | 5 +++-- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/org.spearce.jgit/src/org/spearce/jgit/lib/PackWriter.java b/org.spearce.jgit/src/org/spearce/jgit/lib/PackWriter.java > index ea63942..3d7004d 100644 > --- a/org.spearce.jgit/src/org/spearce/jgit/lib/PackWriter.java > +++ b/org.spearce.jgit/src/org/spearce/jgit/lib/PackWriter.java > @@ -230,8 +230,8 @@ public class PackWriter { > public PackWriter(final Repository repo, final ProgressMonitor imonitor, > final ProgressMonitor wmonitor) { > this.db = repo; > - initMonitor = imonitor; > - writeMonitor = wmonitor; > + initMonitor = (imonitor == null ? new NullProgressMonitor() : imonitor); > + writeMonitor = (wmonitor == null ? new NullProgressMonitor() : wmonitor); Can't we use NullProgressMonitor.INSTANCE instead? Also the () around the ?: expression are unnecessary here and our coding style tends not to include them. > @@ -829,6 +829,7 @@ public class PackWriter { > RevObject o = walker.parseAny(id); > walker.markStart(o); > } > + if (uninterestingObjects != null) > for (ObjectId id : uninterestingObjects) { Please fix the indentation of the other code to be properly under the if, or change the variable to be non-final and assign it an empty list if its null, so the for() runs but doesn't crash. Or do that in the only caller, preparePack(Collection,Collection). -- Shawn.