From: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] bisect: add "check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad" function
Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 17:55:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090509155548.5387.30838.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090509154419.5324.96204.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
This is a port of the function with the same name that is in
"git-bisect.sh". The new function is not used yet but will be in
a later patch.
We also implement an helper "check_ancestors" function that use
"start_command" and "finish_command" to launch
"git rev-list $good ^$bad".
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
---
bisect.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bisect.c b/bisect.c
index b24ee78..09102da 100644
--- a/bisect.c
+++ b/bisect.c
@@ -751,6 +751,81 @@ static void check_merge_bases(void)
}
/*
+ * This function runs the command "git rev-list $_good ^$_bad"
+ * and returns 1 if it produces some output, 0 otherwise.
+ */
+static int check_ancestors(void)
+{
+ struct argv_array rev_argv = { NULL, 0, 0 };
+ struct strbuf str = STRBUF_INIT;
+ int i, result = 0;
+ struct child_process rls;
+ FILE *rls_fout;
+
+ argv_array_push(&rev_argv, xstrdup("rev-list"));
+ argv_array_push_sha1(&rev_argv, current_bad_sha1, "^%s");
+ for (i = 0; i < good_revs.sha1_nr; i++)
+ argv_array_push_sha1(&rev_argv, good_revs.sha1[i], "%s");
+ argv_array_push(&rev_argv, NULL);
+
+ memset(&rls, 0, sizeof(rls));
+ rls.argv = rev_argv.argv;
+ rls.out = -1;
+ rls.git_cmd = 1;
+ if (start_command(&rls))
+ die("Could not launch 'git rev-list' command.");
+ rls_fout = fdopen(rls.out, "r");
+ while (strbuf_getline(&str, rls_fout, '\n') != EOF) {
+ strbuf_trim(&str);
+ if (*str.buf) {
+ result = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ fclose(rls_fout);
+ finish_command(&rls);
+
+ return result;
+}
+
+/*
+ * "check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad" checks that all "good" revs are
+ * ancestor of the "bad" rev.
+ *
+ * If that's not the case, we need to check the merge bases.
+ * If a merge base must be tested by the user, its source code will be
+ * checked out to be tested by the user and we will exit.
+ */
+static void check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad(const char *prefix)
+{
+ const char *filename = git_path("BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK");
+ struct stat st;
+ int fd;
+
+ if (!current_bad_sha1)
+ die("a bad revision is needed");
+
+ /* Check if file BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK exists. */
+ if (!stat(filename, &st) && S_ISREG(st.st_mode))
+ return;
+
+ /* Bisecting with no good rev is ok. */
+ if (good_revs.sha1_nr == 0)
+ return;
+
+ if (check_ancestors())
+ check_merge_bases();
+
+ /* Create file BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK. */
+ fd = open(filename, O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_WRONLY, 0600);
+ if (fd < 0)
+ warning("could not create file '%s': %s",
+ filename, strerror(errno));
+ else
+ close(fd);
+}
+
+/*
* We use the convention that exiting with an exit code 10 means that
* the bisection process finished successfully.
* In this case the calling shell script should exit 0.
--
1.6.3.rc1.112.g17e25
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-09 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-09 15:55 [PATCH 00/10] bisect: port git bisect merge base checking to C Christian Couder
2009-05-09 15:55 ` [PATCH 01/10] bisect: use "sha1_array" to store skipped revisions Christian Couder
2009-05-09 15:55 ` [PATCH 02/10] bisect: implement "rev_argv_push" to fill an argv with revs Christian Couder
2009-05-09 15:55 ` [PATCH 03/10] bisect: store good revisions in a "sha1_array" Christian Couder
2009-05-09 15:55 ` [PATCH 04/10] bisect: use new "struct argv_array" to prepare argv for "setup_revisions" Christian Couder
2009-05-09 15:55 ` [PATCH 05/10] bisect: remove too much function nesting Christian Couder
2009-05-09 15:55 ` [PATCH 06/10] bisect: make skipped array functions more generic Christian Couder
2009-05-09 15:55 ` [PATCH 07/10] bisect: automatically sort sha1_array if needed when looking it up Christian Couder
2009-05-09 16:28 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-05-10 4:44 ` Christian Couder
2009-05-09 15:55 ` [PATCH 08/10] bisect: implement the "check_merge_bases" function Christian Couder
2009-05-09 15:55 ` Christian Couder [this message]
2009-05-09 15:55 ` [PATCH 10/10] bisect: make "git bisect" use new "--next-all" bisect-helper function Christian Couder
2009-05-11 0:44 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090509155548.5387.30838.chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--to=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).