From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Heidelberg Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix git-push --mirror also mirroring refs/remotes/ Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 00:15:06 +0200 Message-ID: <200905110015.06939.markus.heidelberg@web.de> References: <1241984136-2578-1-git-send-email-bryan@shatow.net> <200905102313.13544.markus.heidelberg@web.de> <7vskjctyey.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Reply-To: markus.heidelberg@web.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Bryan Drewery , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 11 00:15:21 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M3HIj-0002Ml-MY for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 00:15:18 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753533AbZEJWPK (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2009 18:15:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752653AbZEJWPJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2009 18:15:09 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:54135 "EHLO fmmailgate02.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752504AbZEJWPI (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2009 18:15:08 -0400 Received: from smtp07.web.de (fmsmtp07.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.215]) by fmmailgate02.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F23DFEB64E2; Mon, 11 May 2009 00:15:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [89.59.125.79] (helo=.) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (WEB.DE 4.110 #277) id 1M3HIZ-00063R-00; Mon, 11 May 2009 00:15:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 In-Reply-To: <7vskjctyey.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Jabber-ID: markus.heidelberg@web.de Content-Disposition: inline X-Sender: markus.heidelberg@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18JYvbnsu9UEGOsRAct8l9GPiimg26zMrfuifh4 eIJbqhrSNywsdhPlmV9hIOFB/g1TN0/MQaayTwut/W6r4pO1/5 pA7FBeE5MSlLCznXaEBg== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano, 10.05.2009: > Markus Heidelberg writes: > > > Bryan Drewery, 10.05.2009: > >> This behavior makes no sense to me. Can we at least add a config option > >> to make it not push remotes? I push my development repository > >> to a remote private repository only as a backup, and push my master/next > >> to a public repository. I see no reason to push my 8 remotes and > >> all their branches to my backup repository. > > > > Why are you disturbed by the remotes, if it's only a backup repository > > where you don't look into in the normal case? > > I suspect you got a wrong "backup". > > [...] > > It would be a regression if you stop pushing the refs/remotes > hierarchy, and such a proposal must be backed by an argument that says the > benefit such a change brings in far outweighs the regression it causes. I'm not sure if this is addressed to me, but I'm not for removing refs/remotes from push --mirror, maybe I was a bit confusing above. Markus