From: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2009, #02; Sun, 17)
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 04:41:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090517114142.GA25956@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vab5ci281.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 01:05:18AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> [Actively cooking]
>
> * da/mergetool-lib (Sat May 2 01:57:21 2009 -0700) 1 commit
> - mergetool--lib: specialize diff options for emerge and ecmerge
>
> Can somebody tell me what the current status of this is? I thought there
> was some objection, but I lost track...
This one was good to go.
The original reporter of the problem w/ emerge was happy with
the patch. The specialization for ecmerge was also correct.
The objection was about having to translate the ecmerge command
name for mac os x (which the patch doesn't do). We
settled on not doing it (meaning leave the patch alone
as-is) since it's not customary for os x users to have ecmerge
in their $PATH and thus it's up to them to configure it if
they want it. The motivation being that we don't want to
start special-casing any platforms.
The patch for araxis was also good (after explaining that the
-title: options don't work correctly which is why the patch
didn't include it). I can resend again later in case
it got lost. I also share Dscho's "if it's not free then I
won't touch it" attitude, tho I'm not opposed to helping out
users on under-privileged platforms from time to time.
It seemed like Myagi(?) wasted a lot of time getting araxis
working with msysgit/mergetool so porting the patch to
mergetool--lib felt like the nice thing to do.
--
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-17 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-17 8:05 What's cooking in git.git (May 2009, #02; Sun, 17) Junio C Hamano
2009-05-17 9:45 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-05-17 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-05-17 18:27 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-05-17 11:41 ` David Aguilar [this message]
2009-05-18 13:36 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-18 19:40 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-05-18 21:55 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-19 0:35 ` [PATCH] git-submodule: add support for --merge Johan Herland
2009-05-19 1:33 ` What's cooking in git.git (May 2009, #02; Sun, 17) Junio C Hamano
2009-05-19 7:23 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-19 8:17 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-05-19 8:45 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-19 11:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-05-19 13:26 ` git submodule update --merge (Was: What's cooking in git.git (May 2009, #02; Sun, 17)) Johan Herland
2009-05-25 11:59 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-25 18:33 ` git submodule update --merge Junio C Hamano
2009-05-25 18:57 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-05-25 19:04 ` Avery Pennarun
2009-05-25 19:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-05-25 22:48 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-25 22:10 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-25 23:15 ` git submodule update --merge (Was: What's cooking in git.git (May 2009, #02; Sun, 17)) Peter Hutterer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090517114142.GA25956@gmail.com \
--to=davvid@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).