From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Request for detailed documentation of git pack protocol
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:04:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090603220456.GQ3355@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906040004.18594.jnareb@gmail.com>
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> So do I understand correctly that capabilities are governed by the
> following generic rules:
>
> 1. Server sends space separated list of capabilities it support. It
> MUST NOT send capabilities it *does not* support. It MAY NOT send
> "include-tag" if there are no tag objects (or is it SHOULD NOT?).
The server SHOULD send include-tag, if it supports it, irregardless
of whether or not there are tags available. Its just easier to
code the server to send the R@!* line up front based on the software
version, and not the repository content.
> 2. Client sends space separated list of capabilities it wants. It SHOULD
> (or perhaps it is MAY?) send subset of server capabilities, i.e do
> not send capabilities served does not advertise.
It SHOULD send a subset of server capabilities.
> 3. Server MUST ignore capabilities it does not understand.
True.
> Server MUST NOT ignore capabilities (or SHOULD NOT only?) that
> client requested and server advertised.
True, MUST NOT. Otherwise you will have protocol errors.
However, include-tag can be SHOULD NOT... since the client must be
able to recover from it anyway.
> I know that client MUST send only maximum of one of "side-band" and
> "side-band-64k", but how should server reacts if client sends both?
> Should it use "side-band-64k"?
MUST favor side-band-64k if client requests both.
--
Shawn.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-03 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-12 21:29 Request for detailed documentation of git pack protocol Jakub Narebski
2009-05-12 23:34 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-05-14 8:24 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-05-14 14:57 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-05-14 15:02 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-05-15 20:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-15 16:51 ` Clemens Buchacher
2009-05-14 18:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-05-14 20:27 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-05-14 13:55 ` Scott Chacon
2009-05-14 14:44 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-05-14 15:01 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-05-15 0:58 ` A Large Angry SCM
2009-05-15 19:05 ` Ealdwulf Wuffinga
2009-06-02 21:39 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-02 23:27 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03 0:50 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 1:29 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03 2:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-06-03 2:15 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03 9:21 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 14:48 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03 15:07 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03 15:39 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 15:50 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03 16:51 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 16:56 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03 20:19 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 20:24 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03 22:04 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 22:04 ` Shawn O. Pearce [this message]
2009-06-03 22:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-06-03 22:46 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-04 7:17 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-06-04 7:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-06-06 16:33 ` Scott Chacon
2009-06-06 17:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-06-06 17:41 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 21:38 ` Tony Finch
2009-06-03 17:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-06-03 19:05 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-06-03 2:18 ` Robin H. Johnson
2009-06-03 10:47 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 14:17 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03 20:56 ` Tony Finch
2009-06-03 21:20 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 21:53 ` Tony Finch
2009-06-04 8:45 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-04 11:41 ` Tony Finch
2009-06-04 18:41 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03 12:29 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 14:19 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-04 20:55 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-04 21:57 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-05 0:45 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-05 7:24 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-05 8:45 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-06 21:38 ` Comments pack protocol description in "Git Community Book" (second round) Jakub Narebski
2009-06-06 21:58 ` Scott Chacon
2009-06-07 8:21 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-07 20:13 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-07 20:43 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-13 9:30 ` Comments pack protocol description in "RFC for the Git Packfile Protocol" (long) Jakub Narebski
2009-06-07 20:06 ` Comments pack protocol description in "Git Community Book" (second round) Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-09 9:39 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-09 14:28 ` Shawn O. Pearce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090603220456.GQ3355@spearce.org \
--to=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=schacon@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).