git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Request for detailed documentation of git pack protocol
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:04:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090603220456.GQ3355@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906040004.18594.jnareb@gmail.com>

Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> So do I understand correctly that capabilities are governed by the
> following generic rules:
> 
> 1. Server sends space separated list of capabilities it support. It
>    MUST NOT send capabilities it *does not* support. It MAY NOT send
>    "include-tag" if there are no tag objects (or is it SHOULD NOT?).

The server SHOULD send include-tag, if it supports it, irregardless
of whether or not there are tags available.  Its just easier to
code the server to send the R@!* line up front based on the software
version, and not the repository content.

> 2. Client sends space separated list of capabilities it wants. It SHOULD
>    (or perhaps it is MAY?) send subset of server capabilities, i.e do
>    not send capabilities served does not advertise.

It SHOULD send a subset of server capabilities.

> 3. Server MUST ignore capabilities it does not understand.

True.

> Server MUST NOT ignore capabilities (or SHOULD NOT only?) that
> client requested and server advertised.

True, MUST NOT.  Otherwise you will have protocol errors.

However, include-tag can be SHOULD NOT... since the client must be
able to recover from it anyway.

> I know that client MUST send only maximum of one of "side-band" and 
> "side-band-64k", but how should server reacts if client sends both?
> Should it use "side-band-64k"?

MUST favor side-band-64k if client requests both.

-- 
Shawn.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-03 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-12 21:29 Request for detailed documentation of git pack protocol Jakub Narebski
2009-05-12 23:34 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-05-14  8:24   ` Jakub Narebski
2009-05-14 14:57     ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-05-14 15:02       ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-05-15 20:29         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-15 16:51       ` Clemens Buchacher
2009-05-14 18:13     ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-05-14 20:27       ` Jakub Narebski
2009-05-14 13:55   ` Scott Chacon
2009-05-14 14:44     ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-05-14 15:01     ` Jakub Narebski
2009-05-15  0:58       ` A Large Angry SCM
2009-05-15 19:05         ` Ealdwulf Wuffinga
2009-06-02 21:39     ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-02 23:27       ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03  0:50         ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03  1:29           ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03  2:11             ` Junio C Hamano
2009-06-03  2:15               ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03  9:21             ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 14:48               ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03 15:07                 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03 15:39                   ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 15:50                     ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03 16:51                 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 16:56                   ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03 20:19                     ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 20:24                       ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03 22:04                         ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 22:04                           ` Shawn O. Pearce [this message]
2009-06-03 22:16                           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-06-03 22:46                             ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-04  7:17                         ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-06-04  7:26                           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-06-06 16:33                     ` Scott Chacon
2009-06-06 17:24                       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-06-06 17:41                       ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 21:38                   ` Tony Finch
2009-06-03 17:11                 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-06-03 19:05                 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-06-03  2:18           ` Robin H. Johnson
2009-06-03 10:47             ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 14:17               ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03 20:56           ` Tony Finch
2009-06-03 21:20             ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 21:53               ` Tony Finch
2009-06-04  8:45                 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-04 11:41                   ` Tony Finch
2009-06-04 18:41                   ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-03 12:29       ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-03 14:19         ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-04 20:55       ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-04 21:57         ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-05  0:45         ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-05  7:24           ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-05  8:45             ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-06 21:38       ` Comments pack protocol description in "Git Community Book" (second round) Jakub Narebski
2009-06-06 21:58         ` Scott Chacon
2009-06-07  8:21           ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-07 20:13             ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-07 20:43           ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-13  9:30           ` Comments pack protocol description in "RFC for the Git Packfile Protocol" (long) Jakub Narebski
2009-06-07 20:06         ` Comments pack protocol description in "Git Community Book" (second round) Shawn O. Pearce
2009-06-09  9:39           ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-09 14:28             ` Shawn O. Pearce

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090603220456.GQ3355@spearce.org \
    --to=spearce@spearce.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=schacon@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).