git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TopGit PATCH] hooks/pre-commit: check for cycles in dependencies
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 22:25:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090605202526.GB671@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244148073-2313-1-git-send-email-bert.wesarg@googlemail.com>

Hi Bert,

On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 10:41:13PM +0200, Bert Wesarg wrote:
> Only newly added dependencies needs to be considered.  For each of these deps
> check if there is a path from this dep to the current HEAD.
> 
> Use recursive_dep() for this task.  Even if recursive_dep() uses a DFS-like
> traversal it will not run into an infty-loop if there would be a cycle, because
I'm not sure how understandable this is.  After some thinking I
understood DFS.  Up to now I thought infty is just the LaTeX macro name
for "infinity", but apart of this, is this really the right term here?
endless loop?

> recursive_dep() takes .topdeps only from committed trees.  And it is required
> that the committed dependency graph is acyclic.

I didn't check the implementation deeply.  But all in all I don't have
the usual warm and fuzzy feeling about it.  What happens during a remote
update if only the merged dependency graph has a cycle[1]?

Best regards
Uwe

[1] The question is a bit theoretic because remote updating is broken
here.  If you are my remote and changed a .topdep file, my update simply
discards your change.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                              | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                    | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-05 20:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-04 20:41 [TopGit PATCH] hooks/pre-commit: check for cycles in dependencies Bert Wesarg
2009-06-04 21:33 ` Bert Wesarg
2009-06-05 20:25 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2009-06-08  7:31   ` Bert Wesarg
2009-06-08  7:44     ` TopGit successor Uwe Kleine-König
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-10-04 21:07 [TopGit PATCH] hooks/pre-commit: check for cycles in dependencies Bert Wesarg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090605202526.GB671@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=bert.wesarg@googlemail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).