From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: Who uses Signed-off-by and DCO? Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:00:09 -0400 Message-ID: <20090613030009.GF24336@mit.edu> References: <20090612084207.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> <20090612175105.GD6417@mit.edu> <7vfxe52bk3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Nanako Shiraishi , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 13 05:00:33 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MFJTs-0003eW-C6 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 05:00:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752067AbZFMDAT (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:00:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751996AbZFMDAS (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:00:18 -0400 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:55040 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751775AbZFMDAR (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:00:17 -0400 Received: from root (helo=closure.thunk.org) by thunker.thunk.org with local-esmtp (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1MFJTY-0004o0-4J; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:00:12 -0400 Received: from tytso by closure.thunk.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MFJTV-0001Kg-O2; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:00:09 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vfxe52bk3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@mit.edu X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 05:59:40PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > E2fsprogs uses the DCO convetion as well. > > True; I do not know if it counts as "other than the Kernel project" > in the original question, though. It depends on how you define "the Kernel project", I suppose. E2fsprogs is built on a wide variety of platforms, including the GNU Hurd, FreeBSD, Solaris, and others. So is it part of the "[Linux] Kernel project"? I suppose util-linux-ng might be a closer call (it also uses the DCO convention) as it is pretty well Linux-specific. The developer community of util-linux-ng is primarily not composed of kernel developers, however, although there is some overlap. BTW, some of the X.org git repositories also seem to be using DCO, although its usage seems to be a bit spotty. - Ted