From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: Dividing up a large merge. Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:07:46 -0400 Message-ID: <20090715160746.GI6570@mit.edu> References: <20090714233246.GA25390@huya.quicinc.com> <3e8340490907141716j77df346es1f894d6a7f6cb0aa@mail.gmail.com> <20090715002926.GA26630@huya.quicinc.com> <20090715122828.GA6570@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: davidb@quicinc.com, Bryan Donlan , Git Mailing List To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 15 18:07:59 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MR71S-0004g7-5c for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:07:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755540AbZGOQHu (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:07:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755338AbZGOQHu (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:07:50 -0400 Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:46344 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755300AbZGOQHu (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:07:50 -0400 Received: from root (helo=closure.thunk.org) by thunker.thunk.org with local-esmtp (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1MR71H-0002oe-7N; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:07:47 -0400 Received: from tytso by closure.thunk.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MR71G-0002U7-Ge; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:07:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@mit.edu X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 06:39:46AM -0700, Jakub Narebski wrote: > Theodore Tso writes: > > > Yeah, that's another prime argument for maintaining your changes as a > > patch queue. I use a combination of quilt plus git. > > Why not StGit, or Guilt, or TopGit? Sorry, typo; that should have read "guilt". The example workflow I included used guilt commands. - Ted