From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Rast Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 5/5] Implement 'git stash save --patch' Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 10:45:54 +0200 Message-ID: <200907261045.55551.trast@student.ethz.ch> References: <7vzlat64u1.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Pierre Habouzit , Nanako Shiraishi To: Sverre Rabbelier X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jul 26 10:46:26 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MUzNB-00021C-3Y for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 10:46:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751509AbZGZIqI (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jul 2009 04:46:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751210AbZGZIqH (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jul 2009 04:46:07 -0400 Received: from xsmtp0.ethz.ch ([82.130.70.14]:10044 "EHLO XSMTP0.ethz.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751111AbZGZIqG (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jul 2009 04:46:06 -0400 Received: from xfe2.d.ethz.ch ([82.130.124.42]) by XSMTP0.ethz.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 26 Jul 2009 10:46:05 +0200 Received: from thomas.localnet ([77.56.221.170]) by xfe2.d.ethz.ch over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 26 Jul 2009 10:46:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.27.25-0.1-default; KDE/4.2.98; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2009 08:46:04.0616 (UTC) FILETIME=[82B9EC80:01CA0DCD] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 14:29, Thomas Rast wrote: > > This adds a hunk-based mode to git-stash. You can select hunks from > > the index and the worktree, and git-stash will attempt to build a > > stash that reflects these changes. > > Awesome! Does it also remove the stashed hunks from the worktree? From > what I gather from the patch it looks like it, but the commit message > doesn't say. Yes, and unless you used --keep-index, also the stashed index-hunks from the index. -- Thomas Rast trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch