From: Adam Simpkins <simpkins@facebook.com>
To: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>, "Santi Béjar" <santi@agolina.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] graph API: fix bug in graph_is_interesting()
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:34:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090819023433.GP8147@facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090819022918.GO8147@facebook.com>
Previously, graph_is_interesting() did not behave quite the same way as
the code in get_revision(). As a result, it would sometimes think
commits were uninteresting, even though get_revision() would return
them. This resulted in incorrect lines in the graph output.
This change creates a get_commit_action() function, which
graph_is_interesting() and simplify_commit() both now use to determine
if a commit will be shown. It is identical to the old simplify_commit()
behavior, except that it never calls rewrite_parents().
This problem was reported by Santi Béjar. The following command
would exhibit the problem before, but now works correctly:
git log --graph --simplify-by-decoration --oneline v1.6.3.3
Previously git graph did not display the output for this command
correctly between f29ac4f and 66996ec, among other places.
Signed-off-by: Adam Simpkins <simpkins@facebook.com>
---
graph.c | 5 +++--
revision.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
revision.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/graph.c b/graph.c
index e466770..9087f65 100644
--- a/graph.c
+++ b/graph.c
@@ -286,9 +286,10 @@ static int graph_is_interesting(struct git_graph *graph, struct commit *commit)
}
/*
- * Uninteresting and pruned commits won't be printed
+ * Otherwise, use get_commit_action() to see if this commit is
+ * interesting
*/
- return (commit->object.flags & (UNINTERESTING | TREESAME)) ? 0 : 1;
+ return get_commit_action(graph->revs, commit) == commit_show;
}
static struct commit_list *next_interesting_parent(struct git_graph *graph,
diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
index 8ffb661..fe7d522 100644
--- a/revision.c
+++ b/revision.c
@@ -1664,7 +1664,7 @@ static inline int want_ancestry(struct rev_info *revs)
return (revs->rewrite_parents || revs->children.name);
}
-enum commit_action simplify_commit(struct rev_info *revs, struct commit *commit)
+enum commit_action get_commit_action(struct rev_info *revs, struct commit *commit)
{
if (commit->object.flags & SHOWN)
return commit_ignore;
@@ -1692,12 +1692,21 @@ enum commit_action simplify_commit(struct rev_info *revs, struct commit *commit)
if (!commit->parents || !commit->parents->next)
return commit_ignore;
}
- if (want_ancestry(revs) && rewrite_parents(revs, commit) < 0)
- return commit_error;
}
return commit_show;
}
+enum commit_action simplify_commit(struct rev_info *revs, struct commit *commit)
+{
+ enum commit_action action = get_commit_action(revs, commit);
+
+ if (action == commit_show && revs->prune && revs->dense && want_ancestry(revs)) {
+ if (rewrite_parents(revs, commit) < 0)
+ return commit_error;
+ }
+ return action;
+}
+
static struct commit *get_revision_1(struct rev_info *revs)
{
if (!revs->commits)
diff --git a/revision.h b/revision.h
index b10984b..9d0dddb 100644
--- a/revision.h
+++ b/revision.h
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ enum commit_action {
commit_error
};
+extern enum commit_action get_commit_action(struct rev_info *revs, struct commit *commit);
extern enum commit_action simplify_commit(struct rev_info *revs, struct commit *commit);
#endif
--
1.6.4.314.g0a482.dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-19 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-18 20:55 interaction between --graph and --simplify-by-decoration Adam Simpkins
2009-08-18 21:18 ` [PATCH] graph API: fix bug in graph_is_interesting() Adam Simpkins
2009-08-18 23:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-08-19 2:29 ` Adam Simpkins
2009-08-19 2:34 ` Adam Simpkins [this message]
2009-08-19 6:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-08-19 6:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-08-19 22:55 ` Adam Simpkins
2009-08-19 22:58 ` [PATCH] Add test case for rev-list --parents --show-all Adam Simpkins
2009-08-20 4:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-08-21 18:20 ` [PATCH] Add tests for rev-list --graph with options that simplify history Adam Simpkins
2009-08-21 20:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-08-21 21:23 ` Adam Simpkins
2009-08-21 15:39 ` [PATCH] graph API: fix bug in graph_is_interesting() Santi Béjar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090819023433.GP8147@facebook.com \
--to=simpkins@facebook.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=santi@agolina.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).