* [PATCH 1/2] Add date formatting and parsing functions relative to a given time
@ 2009-08-28 21:04 Alex Riesen
2009-08-28 21:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] Allow testing of _relative family of time formatting and parsing functions Alex Riesen
2009-08-30 7:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add date formatting and parsing functions relative to a given time Jeff King
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alex Riesen @ 2009-08-28 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: Jeff King, Nicolas Pitre, David Reiss, Junio C Hamano
The main purpose is to allow predictable testing of the code.
---
Rebased on current master.
cache.h | 2 +
date.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
index dd7f71e..3fb0166 100644
--- a/cache.h
+++ b/cache.h
@@ -731,9 +731,11 @@ enum date_mode {
};
const char *show_date(unsigned long time, int timezone, enum date_mode mode);
+const char *show_date_relative(unsigned long time, int tz, const struct timeval *now);
int parse_date(const char *date, char *buf, int bufsize);
void datestamp(char *buf, int bufsize);
unsigned long approxidate(const char *);
+unsigned long approxidate_relative(const char *date, const struct timeval *now);
enum date_mode parse_date_format(const char *format);
#define IDENT_WARN_ON_NO_NAME 1
diff --git a/date.c b/date.c
index f011692..0840e77 100644
--- a/date.c
+++ b/date.c
@@ -84,6 +84,67 @@ static int local_tzoffset(unsigned long time)
return offset * eastwest;
}
+const char *show_date_relative(unsigned long time, int tz, const struct timeval *now)
+{
+ static char timebuf[100 /* TODO: can be optimized */];
+ unsigned long diff;
+ if (now->tv_sec < time)
+ return "in the future";
+ diff = now->tv_sec - time;
+ if (diff < 90) {
+ snprintf(timebuf, sizeof(timebuf), "%lu seconds ago", diff);
+ return timebuf;
+ }
+ /* Turn it into minutes */
+ diff = (diff + 30) / 60;
+ if (diff < 90) {
+ snprintf(timebuf, sizeof(timebuf), "%lu minutes ago", diff);
+ return timebuf;
+ }
+ /* Turn it into hours */
+ diff = (diff + 30) / 60;
+ if (diff < 36) {
+ snprintf(timebuf, sizeof(timebuf), "%lu hours ago", diff);
+ return timebuf;
+ }
+ /* We deal with number of days from here on */
+ diff = (diff + 12) / 24;
+ if (diff < 14) {
+ snprintf(timebuf, sizeof(timebuf), "%lu days ago", diff);
+ return timebuf;
+ }
+ /* Say weeks for the past 10 weeks or so */
+ if (diff < 70) {
+ snprintf(timebuf, sizeof(timebuf), "%lu weeks ago", (diff + 3) / 7);
+ return timebuf;
+ }
+ /* Say months for the past 12 months or so */
+ if (diff < 360) {
+ snprintf(timebuf, sizeof(timebuf), "%lu months ago", (diff + 15) / 30);
+ return timebuf;
+ }
+ /* Give years and months for 5 years or so */
+ if (diff < 1825) {
+ unsigned long years = diff / 365;
+ unsigned long months = (diff % 365 + 15) / 30;
+ int n;
+ n = snprintf(timebuf, sizeof(timebuf), "%lu year%s",
+ years, (years > 1 ? "s" : ""));
+ if (months)
+ snprintf(timebuf + n, sizeof(timebuf) - n,
+ ", %lu month%s ago",
+ months, (months > 1 ? "s" : ""));
+ else
+ snprintf(timebuf + n, sizeof(timebuf) - n,
+ " ago");
+ return timebuf;
+ }
+ /* Otherwise, just years. Centuries is probably overkill. */
+ snprintf(timebuf, sizeof(timebuf), "%lu years ago", (diff + 183) / 365);
+ return timebuf;
+
+}
+
const char *show_date(unsigned long time, int tz, enum date_mode mode)
{
struct tm *tm;
@@ -95,63 +156,9 @@ const char *show_date(unsigned long time, int tz, enum date_mode mode)
}
if (mode == DATE_RELATIVE) {
- unsigned long diff;
struct timeval now;
gettimeofday(&now, NULL);
- if (now.tv_sec < time)
- return "in the future";
- diff = now.tv_sec - time;
- if (diff < 90) {
- snprintf(timebuf, sizeof(timebuf), "%lu seconds ago", diff);
- return timebuf;
- }
- /* Turn it into minutes */
- diff = (diff + 30) / 60;
- if (diff < 90) {
- snprintf(timebuf, sizeof(timebuf), "%lu minutes ago", diff);
- return timebuf;
- }
- /* Turn it into hours */
- diff = (diff + 30) / 60;
- if (diff < 36) {
- snprintf(timebuf, sizeof(timebuf), "%lu hours ago", diff);
- return timebuf;
- }
- /* We deal with number of days from here on */
- diff = (diff + 12) / 24;
- if (diff < 14) {
- snprintf(timebuf, sizeof(timebuf), "%lu days ago", diff);
- return timebuf;
- }
- /* Say weeks for the past 10 weeks or so */
- if (diff < 70) {
- snprintf(timebuf, sizeof(timebuf), "%lu weeks ago", (diff + 3) / 7);
- return timebuf;
- }
- /* Say months for the past 12 months or so */
- if (diff < 360) {
- snprintf(timebuf, sizeof(timebuf), "%lu months ago", (diff + 15) / 30);
- return timebuf;
- }
- /* Give years and months for 5 years or so */
- if (diff < 1825) {
- unsigned long years = diff / 365;
- unsigned long months = (diff % 365 + 15) / 30;
- int n;
- n = snprintf(timebuf, sizeof(timebuf), "%lu year%s",
- years, (years > 1 ? "s" : ""));
- if (months)
- snprintf(timebuf + n, sizeof(timebuf) - n,
- ", %lu month%s ago",
- months, (months > 1 ? "s" : ""));
- else
- snprintf(timebuf + n, sizeof(timebuf) - n,
- " ago");
- return timebuf;
- }
- /* Otherwise, just years. Centuries is probably overkill. */
- snprintf(timebuf, sizeof(timebuf), "%lu years ago", (diff + 183) / 365);
- return timebuf;
+ return show_date_relative(time, tz, &now);
}
if (mode == DATE_LOCAL)
@@ -866,19 +873,13 @@ static const char *approxidate_digit(const char *date, struct tm *tm, int *num)
return end;
}
-unsigned long approxidate(const char *date)
+static unsigned long approximation(const char *date, const struct timeval *tv)
{
int number = 0;
struct tm tm, now;
- struct timeval tv;
time_t time_sec;
- char buffer[50];
- if (parse_date(date, buffer, sizeof(buffer)) > 0)
- return strtoul(buffer, NULL, 10);
-
- gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
- time_sec = tv.tv_sec;
+ time_sec = tv->tv_sec;
localtime_r(&time_sec, &tm);
now = tm;
for (;;) {
@@ -899,3 +900,26 @@ unsigned long approxidate(const char *date)
tm.tm_year--;
return mktime(&tm);
}
+
+unsigned long approxidate_relative(const char *date, const struct timeval *tv)
+{
+ char buffer[50];
+
+ if (parse_date(date, buffer, sizeof(buffer)) > 0)
+ return strtoul(buffer, NULL, 10);
+
+ return approximation(date, tv);
+}
+
+unsigned long approxidate(const char *date)
+{
+ struct timeval tv;
+ char buffer[50];
+
+ if (parse_date(date, buffer, sizeof(buffer)) > 0)
+ return strtoul(buffer, NULL, 10);
+
+ gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
+ return approximation(date, &tv);
+}
+
--
1.6.4.1.263.g468a
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] Allow testing of _relative family of time formatting and parsing functions
2009-08-28 21:04 [PATCH 1/2] Add date formatting and parsing functions relative to a given time Alex Riesen
@ 2009-08-28 21:05 ` Alex Riesen
2009-08-30 7:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add date formatting and parsing functions relative to a given time Jeff King
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alex Riesen @ 2009-08-28 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: Jeff King, Nicolas Pitre, David Reiss, Junio C Hamano
To complement the testability of approxidate.
---
test-date.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test-date.c b/test-date.c
index 62e8f23..dcc7973 100644
--- a/test-date.c
+++ b/test-date.c
@@ -4,6 +4,17 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int i;
+ struct tm tm;
+ struct timeval when = {0, 0};
+ tm.tm_sec = 0;
+ tm.tm_min = 0;
+ tm.tm_hour = 12;
+ tm.tm_mday = 1;
+ tm.tm_mon = 0 /* January */;
+ tm.tm_year = 90 /* 1990 */ ;
+ tm.tm_isdst = -1;
+ when.tv_sec = mktime(&tm);
+
for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) {
char result[100];
time_t t;
@@ -15,6 +26,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
t = approxidate(argv[i]);
printf("%s -> %s\n", argv[i], ctime(&t));
+
+ t = approxidate_relative(argv[i], &when);
+ printf("relative: %s -> %s\n", argv[i], ctime(&t));
+
+ printf("relative: %s, out of %s\n",
+ show_date_relative(t, 0, &when), ctime(&t));
}
return 0;
}
--
1.6.4.1.263.g468a
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add date formatting and parsing functions relative to a given time
2009-08-28 21:04 [PATCH 1/2] Add date formatting and parsing functions relative to a given time Alex Riesen
2009-08-28 21:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] Allow testing of _relative family of time formatting and parsing functions Alex Riesen
@ 2009-08-30 7:36 ` Jeff King
2009-08-30 7:51 ` Alex Riesen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeff King @ 2009-08-30 7:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Riesen; +Cc: git, Nicolas Pitre, David Reiss, Junio C Hamano
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:04:04PM +0200, Alex Riesen wrote:
> +const char *show_date_relative(unsigned long time, int tz, const struct timeval *now)
> +{
> + static char timebuf[100 /* TODO: can be optimized */];
This was 200 in the original version. I doubt that it makes a
difference, but I think in a refactoring patch I think it is best to
simply reorganize and make no other changes.
> +static unsigned long approximation(const char *date, const struct timeval *tv)
I know it's static, but this is a terribly undescriptive function name.
Approximation of what? Can we call it approxidate_internal or
something?
-Peff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add date formatting and parsing functions relative to a given time
2009-08-30 7:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add date formatting and parsing functions relative to a given time Jeff King
@ 2009-08-30 7:51 ` Alex Riesen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alex Riesen @ 2009-08-30 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff King; +Cc: git, Nicolas Pitre, David Reiss, Junio C Hamano
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 09:36, Jeff King<peff@peff.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:04:04PM +0200, Alex Riesen wrote:
>
>> +const char *show_date_relative(unsigned long time, int tz, const struct timeval *now)
>> +{
>> + static char timebuf[100 /* TODO: can be optimized */];
>
> This was 200 in the original version. I doubt that it makes a
> difference, but I think in a refactoring patch I think it is best to
> simply reorganize and make no other changes.
Yes, I just noticed that 200 was much too much, made the note
to fix it sometime and forgot the note in the final submission.
>> +static unsigned long approximation(const char *date, const struct timeval *tv)
>
> I know it's static, but this is a terribly undescriptive function name.
> Approximation of what? Can we call it approxidate_internal or
> something?
Been there, tried that. Didn't like it, because it didn't feel enough
approxidate (the original) anymore. Not even internally, because
of missing parse_date. My other attempts were guessdate and
approxidate_bottom_half (but only very shortly).
The "approximation", if you consider the functions arguments,
seems to me the closest to what the function _is_. OTOH,
maybe I should have used a verb...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] Allow testing of _relative family of time formatting and parsing functions
2009-08-30 9:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add date formatting and parsing functions relative to a given time Alex Riesen
@ 2009-08-30 9:15 ` Alex Riesen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alex Riesen @ 2009-08-30 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: Jeff King, Nicolas Pitre, David Reiss, Junio C Hamano
To complement the testability of approxidate.
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
---
Alex Riesen, Sun, Aug 30, 2009 11:13:46 +0200:
> test-date.c is updated and shall follow in a moment.
here it goes.
test-date.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test-date.c b/test-date.c
index 62e8f23..4cb146d 100644
--- a/test-date.c
+++ b/test-date.c
@@ -4,6 +4,19 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int i;
+ /* see date.c, function show_date_relative */
+ char timebuf[(sizeof(long) * 5 / 2 + sizeof(" minutes ago,")) * 2];
+ struct tm tm;
+ struct timeval when = {0, 0};
+ tm.tm_sec = 0;
+ tm.tm_min = 0;
+ tm.tm_hour = 12;
+ tm.tm_mday = 1;
+ tm.tm_mon = 0 /* January */;
+ tm.tm_year = 90 /* 1990 */ ;
+ tm.tm_isdst = -1;
+ when.tv_sec = mktime(&tm);
+
for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) {
char result[100];
time_t t;
@@ -15,6 +28,13 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
t = approxidate(argv[i]);
printf("%s -> %s\n", argv[i], ctime(&t));
+
+ t = approxidate_relative(argv[i], &when);
+ printf("relative: %s -> %s", argv[i], ctime(&t));
+
+ printf("relative: %s, out of %s",
+ show_date_relative(t, 0, &when, timebuf,sizeof(timebuf)),
+ ctime(&t));
}
return 0;
}
--
1.6.4.1.294.g16262
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-30 9:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-28 21:04 [PATCH 1/2] Add date formatting and parsing functions relative to a given time Alex Riesen
2009-08-28 21:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] Allow testing of _relative family of time formatting and parsing functions Alex Riesen
2009-08-30 7:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add date formatting and parsing functions relative to a given time Jeff King
2009-08-30 7:51 ` Alex Riesen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-28 15:02 [PATCH] Round-down years in "years+months" relative date view Jeff King
2009-08-28 17:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-08-28 19:03 ` Alex Riesen
2009-08-28 19:15 ` Jeff King
2009-08-28 19:20 ` Alex Riesen
2009-08-28 19:33 ` Alex Riesen
2009-08-28 20:52 ` [PATCH] Allow testing of _relative family of time formatting and parsing functions Alex Riesen
2009-08-29 21:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-08-30 7:25 ` Alex Riesen
2009-08-30 9:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add date formatting and parsing functions relative to a given time Alex Riesen
2009-08-30 9:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] Allow testing of _relative family of time formatting and parsing functions Alex Riesen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).