From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] tests: add date printing and parsing tests Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:03:28 -0400 Message-ID: <20090901030328.GA24938@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20090831022228.GA4833@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20090831023015.GC5507@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Linus Torvalds , Alex Riesen , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 01 05:04:09 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MiJfD-0007jK-Ri for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:04:08 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751816AbZIADDa (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:03:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751815AbZIADDa (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:03:30 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:58321 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751751AbZIADDa (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:03:30 -0400 Received: (qmail 29917 invoked by uid 107); 1 Sep 2009 03:03:43 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:03:43 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:03:28 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090831023015.GC5507@coredump.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:30:15PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > - We confirm that the improvements in b5373e9 and 1bddb25 > work. Ugh. I just realized (when explaining how awesome git resurrect was in another mail) that I managed to bungle these commit hashes (and the one mentioned in the following patch). What happened is that I was building on the topic branch and lazily did a "rebase -i origin" to fix up my patches. I left the first two patches untouched, of course, but they still ended up with new committer information. As my patches are merged to 'next' already, I think it is too late to fixup the commit message. But for posterity, the correct referenced commits are 9029055 and 36e4986. Caveat rebaser. -Peff