From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: jk/1.7.0-status, was: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2009, #02; Mon, 07)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 07:59:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090909115924.GA31149@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vtyzexnhm.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 05:56:53PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * jk/1.7.0-status (2009-09-05) 5 commits
> - docs: note that status configuration affects only long format
> (merged to 'next' on 2009-09-07 at 8a7c563)
> + commit: support alternate status formats
> + status: add --porcelain output format
> + status: refactor format option parsing
> + status: refactor short-mode printing to its own function
> (this branch uses jc/1.7.0-status.)
>
> Gives the --short output format to post 1.7.0 "git commit --dry-run" that
> is similar to that of post 1.7.0 "git status".
>
> It might be a good idea to make the --short format part of 1.6.6 without
> waiting for 1.7.0; it would require some branch shuffling to bring the
> short-status patch earlier than the one that makes "status" different from
> "commit --dry-run", though.
It looks like the short-status patch is already right before "commit
--dry-run", but it is of course part of "git stat". So we could get by
with branching from jc/1.7.0-status^, and do one of:
1. develop as if we were a totally separate topic, refactoring, adding
--porcelain mode, etc.
2. just support "--short" from "git status" with as small a change as
possible, and let the rest of the enhancements stay where they are,
for 1.7.0
Option (1) is what I would usually do, but I think in this case it is
just going to end up with me re-doing lots of work as the
almost-duplicated refactoring happening in the two branches is going to
make a gigantic conflict.
And of course option (3) is to just let --short rest until 1.7.0.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-09 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-08 0:56 What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2009, #02; Mon, 07) Junio C Hamano
2009-09-08 6:31 ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-09-08 6:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-08 13:10 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-09-08 13:17 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-09-09 11:59 ` Jeff King [this message]
2009-09-10 16:18 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-09-10 16:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-09-10 17:55 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-09-10 18:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-11 0:09 ` scissors definition and documentation Nicolas Sebrecht
2009-09-11 0:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] mailinfo: add '--scissors' to usage message Nicolas Sebrecht
2009-09-11 0:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] add documentation for mailinfo.scissors and '--no-scissors' Nicolas Sebrecht
2009-09-11 0:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Nicolas Sebrecht
2009-09-11 7:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-11 13:41 ` [PATCH v2] " Nicolas Sebrecht
2009-09-11 18:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-11 20:08 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
2009-09-11 21:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-12 3:03 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
[not found] ` <682ef47420f36d8c53e42981370d377b621d7b86.1252698215.git.nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>
2009-09-11 19:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] " Nicolas Sebrecht
2009-09-12 0:33 ` What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2009, #02; Mon, 07) Junio C Hamano
2009-09-12 4:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-12 11:46 ` Sverre Rabbelier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090909115924.GA31149@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).