From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Sebrecht Subject: Re: Pair Programming Workflow Suggestions Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:17:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20090916141730.GA24893@vidovic> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sean Estabrooks , Git Mailing List , Nicolas Sebrecht To: Tim Visher X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Sep 16 16:17:45 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MnvKJ-0000CL-6L for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:17:43 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753441AbZIPORe (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:17:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752712AbZIPORd (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:17:33 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f206.google.com ([209.85.219.206]:41149 "EHLO mail-ew0-f206.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751998AbZIPORc (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:17:32 -0400 Received: by ewy2 with SMTP id 2so1457015ewy.17 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:17:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=1XttziCJx3P3s1R5hoc8QJSKIzpkMHOemHNW8T6s0sM=; b=QDzSKacnl/ZPj64dV19YR/gnlFiKJQuVNfFSJGxgaaXKvVvncKoc0eJs3T3l92Ucww 6WjuP8xIirvuRUJ55imrFZ20KYbwEvbnzXi2/JE9mHsqhYSN711XZ91dev6wbfyywsLy Buk7R+N40JeV7CmSCbPnZmxtvuixVhjayPBmg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=BtRonoEi2HJbYkF02PXhOj+u+ZrKJK1ZK7u0SF24pIdKiD0E37feudw+tE88j7PCrk BUVZcfR3bq2O69afTyuJvXv2a8MLidx4aJfkz/jwkLH9+2qFj+HkdE4MRdzL0T7qR/OZ TLIlfblP/E5QnLiHT37QnG5XR+iPsAAqCl+ls= Received: by 10.210.9.13 with SMTP id 13mr2412147ebi.3.1253110655450; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from @ (91-164-145-100.rev.libertysurf.net [91.164.145.100]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm2768087eyh.3.2009.09.16.07.17.32 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:17:33 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: The 16/09/09, Tim Visher wrote: > > Pairing, on the other hand, is much more > tightly integrated than that. Just like in Brian's post, it's really > a situation of Dev1 _&_ Dev2 wrote this feature, but one of them > happened to be typing and doing most of the nitty-gritty developing. > Changing the authors between committs almost seems to introduce an > arbitrary level of distinction where it's no longer _both_ but _one > then the other_. Does that make my question any clearer? FMPOV (and to follow the Pair Programming purpose), there isn't an "I" in "Pair". So having the same author name and sign-off for each pair is what makes most sense. IMHO, "dev1_and_dev2" is actually the best option. -- Nicolas Sebrecht