From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn O. Pearce" Subject: Re: Re: Git push over git protocol for corporate environment Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 07:47:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20091002144727.GZ14660@spearce.org> References: <00163623ac5d75929b0474e66b96@google.com> <76c5b8580910020741p2024f6c0w70be53338924e7e8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Eugene Sajine X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 02 16:47:38 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MtjQ0-0000ra-Bf for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:47:36 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755064AbZJBOrY (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:47:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754198AbZJBOrY (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:47:24 -0400 Received: from george.spearce.org ([209.20.77.23]:39151 "EHLO george.spearce.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754076AbZJBOrX (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:47:23 -0400 Received: by george.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0294B381FE; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <76c5b8580910020741p2024f6c0w70be53338924e7e8@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Eugene Sajine wrote: > Gitorious is even better!! for corporate use, i think, because of its > team oriented approach, but... man... I would kill for java > implementation or anything as simple as that!! If you want a Java based server, look at either: * SCuMD http://github.com/gaffo/scumd * Gerrit Code Review http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/ I think SCuMD might be easier to install, I don't think it depends upon a database or a servlet container like Gerrit does. But both are a SSH+Git implementation with some access control capabilities, and are implemented in Java. I don't think either is (yet) as easy to install as Hudson CI. Both projects have a much smaller team of developers behind them, and are still focusing on basic functionality rather than ease of new system setup. -- Shawn.