From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josef Wolf Subject: Re: Trying to split repository Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 17:42:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20091002154204.GC26068@raven.wolf.lan> References: <20091001160335.GA26068@raven.wolf.lan> <20091001211340.GB26068@raven.wolf.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 02 17:50:25 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MtkOm-0004kq-VW for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:50:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754497AbZJBPuL (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:50:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754315AbZJBPuL (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:50:11 -0400 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:56369 "EHLO mail.inka.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753615AbZJBPuK (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:50:10 -0400 Received: from raven.inka.de (uucp@[127.0.0.1]) by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) id 1MtkOb-0001SQ-OI; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:50:13 +0200 Received: by raven.inka.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 064602CBFE; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 17:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Followup-To: Josef Wolf , git@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 08:47:15PM -0400, Adam Brewster wrote: > >> > >> git-filter-branch accepts a --prune-empty option that does what I > >> think you're looking for. > > Thanks for your answer, Adam! > > Is this a new option? 1.6.0.2 don't seem to have it? > 1.6.0.2 was released September 2008 (git log -n1 v1.6.0.2). > > This feature was added in October 2008. (git blame > Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt; git log -n1 d3240d93). > > It's still it is missing from the option summary in master though. Thanks for clarifying that, Adam!