From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Interim maintainer tree Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 02:41:29 -0400 Message-ID: <20091004064129.GB7076@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20090925160504.GW14660@spearce.org> <7viqevu1zt.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Oct 04 09:05:45 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MuLA8-0007tG-Gd for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 09:05:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752227AbZJDGmR (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Oct 2009 02:42:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751847AbZJDGmQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Oct 2009 02:42:16 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:38200 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751680AbZJDGmQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Oct 2009 02:42:16 -0400 Received: (qmail 8923 invoked by uid 107); 4 Oct 2009 06:45:03 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 02:45:03 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 04 Oct 2009 02:41:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7viqevu1zt.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 11:06:30PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Thanks, both. > > I've fetched, but haven't fully examined "log ..spearce/*" nor "log ..peff/*" > yet. > > I noticed that some topics in 'pu' have been rebased (not complaining, but > just making sure I am not hallucinating). > > Do you have preferences/suggestions as to how to proceed? Should I just > take the tips over at this point, or do you have some more patches you > were polishing but haven't pushed out that I should wait for? For my stuff, I think you can just take over my tips. I was just collecting and polishing topics, while Shawn was doing integration. For topics I have, please use my versions rather than applying from the list; many of them have extra fixes squashed in, acked-by's collected from the list, etc. Here's a brief status report on what's in my tree: proposed-master One-off patches that I think should go straight to master. ef/mscv-noreturn This is the latest round and I think should be ready for at least 'next' (maybe even 'master' as it is really about the build and not about functionality). ef/msys-imap This is from an RFC which has generated some comments. He should be posting another round soon. 'pu' at best. fc/mutt-alias Latest round that addressed comments. Ready for 'next' if not 'master'. jn/gitweb-patch After some comments with Jakub, I think the code is right but he promised a re-roll with more in the commit message. mr/gitweb-snapshot This is probably the pu rewind you saw. He posted a v5 of his series. I didn't look at it closely, but Jakub ack'd it. tf/doc-pt-br Minor translation update, ack'd by somebody who can read it. :) Ready for 'master'. There are a few patches floating on the list that I haven't picked up or looked too closely at yet. Just so we don't drop anything, they are: - curl http auth tweak: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/129455 The author said he didn't really test it, and I haven't set up http auth to test it with, but probably somebody should do so before applying. :) - a new rev-cache from Nick - silence gcc warning: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/129485 The warning is overly cautious, I think, but it is a dubious enough construct that it is probably worth fixing. - enable openssl on msvc http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.msysgit/7238 This goes on top of ef/msys-imap, but I think that will be getting a re-roll. -Peff