From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,LIST_MIRROR_RECEIVED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: (qmail 11080 invoked by uid 107); 4 Oct 2009 13:49:42 -0000 Received: from vger.kernel.org (HELO vger.kernel.org) (209.132.176.167) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 09:49:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756843AbZJDNmJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Oct 2009 09:42:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756821AbZJDNmI (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Oct 2009 09:42:08 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:59040 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756801AbZJDNmI (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Oct 2009 09:42:08 -0400 Received: (qmail 11049 invoked by uid 107); 4 Oct 2009 13:44:58 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 09:44:58 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 04 Oct 2009 09:41:30 -0400 Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 09:41:30 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, spearce@spearce.org, gitster@pobox.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add the utterly important 'mispel' command Message-ID: <20091004134130.GB14209@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20091004065239.GA7890@coredump.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 12:52:09PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Well, the command is called "mispel", not "autocorrect". So I think you > misunderstood the purpose of the patch. OK, well, then I can rail against the quality of your commit message. ;) > Let this be a lesson, kids: don't review GitTogether patches before you > had a drink. Heh. -Peff