From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] builtin-checkout: suggest creating local branch when appropriate to do so Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:57:52 -0400 Message-ID: <20091013215751.GA12603@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <0016e68fd0123a175304754694b4@google.com> <200910122340.13366.trast@student.ethz.ch> <7vr5t89qiw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <200910130836.57011.trast@student.ethz.ch> <7vljjf226t.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vljjfuibr.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Johannes Sixt , Thomas Rast , Johannes Schindelin , Euguess@gmail.com, Mikael Magnusson , Matthieu Moy , Jay Soffian , git@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Barkalow X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 14 00:17:45 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MxpX4-0001jO-8J for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:07:50 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760299AbZJMV6b (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:58:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753575AbZJMV6a (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:58:30 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:38993 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753100AbZJMV6a (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:58:30 -0400 Received: (qmail 21550 invoked by uid 107); 13 Oct 2009 22:01:22 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:01:22 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:57:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 05:31:46PM -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > I personally think that the real issue is that our "detached HEAD" message > is still too scary, and what we really want is to issue the scary message > when using "git commit" to move a detached HEAD from what was checked out > to a new commit. So: This has been discussed before (I happen to agree with you, but you probably want to address other comments in the thread): http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/38201/focus=38213 -Peff