From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2009, #02; Sun, 11) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:24:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20091014042417.GA28795@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <7vfx9pmhae.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20091012051442.GB23007@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vmy3w9qdd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 14 06:30:31 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MxvVO-0005XA-1p for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:30:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751423AbZJNEY4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:24:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751414AbZJNEY4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:24:56 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:60931 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751413AbZJNEYz (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:24:55 -0400 Received: (qmail 24128 invoked by uid 107); 14 Oct 2009 04:27:48 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:27:48 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:24:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vmy3w9qdd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 03:52:46PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Hmm. I thought you wanted to re-order some of these for to put the > > porcelain and short formats into v1.6.6, but leave the status switchover > > for v1.7.0. > > We could build an alternate history between 3fa509d..46b77a6, revert the > merges 9558627 and 65c8513, and merge the alternate history. But is the > short format support so solid that it deserves to be in 1.6.6 in the > current shape? Somewhere I seem to recall you saying that it would be nice to give the --short format some wider exposure as "git status --short" before making the "status is no longer commit --dry-run" switch-over. But now I can't find that message anywhere. Let's not worry about it. -Peff