From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proof-of-concept patch to remember what the detached HEAD was Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:17:35 -0400 Message-ID: <20091015221735.GA26775@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <7v7huxbtbk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vws2xa9lu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20091014230934.GC29664@coredump.intra.peff.net> <885649360910150036o72c3bd97ofad85d5316dc5b35@mail.gmail.com> <7v1vl45t9k.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20091015212632.GA13180@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7v1vl42uid.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20091015221657.GC13180@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Nicolas Pitre , James Pickens , Daniel Barkalow , Jay Soffian , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 16 00:20:35 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MyYgS-0000Dx-Fl for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:20:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762984AbZJOWSO (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:18:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762982AbZJOWSN (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:18:13 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:38563 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762978AbZJOWSN (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:18:13 -0400 Received: (qmail 10551 invoked by uid 107); 15 Oct 2009 22:21:09 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:21:09 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:17:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091015221657.GC13180@coredump.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 06:16:57PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > So I will buy that this is somewhat of a new idea. I am still confused > about what happens with this, though: > > $ git checkout origin/next > $ git fetch ;# updates origin/next > > Do we refuse the fetch? Does the user now have a working tree and index > that doesn't match their HEAD? OK, nevermind about this, we just crossed emails. -Peff