From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/fetch-options.txt: order options alphabetically Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:25:26 -0400 Message-ID: <20091022112526.GA7005@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <87eiow1pey.fsf@jondo.cante.net> <7vpr8g32ht.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vhbts3285.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20091022192152.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Jari Aalto , git@vger.kernel.org To: Nanako Shiraishi X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 22 13:26:08 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N0vnX-0001kL-Mh for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:25:40 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754711AbZJVLZ3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:25:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753613AbZJVLZ3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:25:29 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:60967 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752494AbZJVLZ2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:25:28 -0400 Received: (qmail 24926 invoked by uid 107); 22 Oct 2009 11:29:08 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:29:08 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:25:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091022192152.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 07:21:52PM +0900, Nanako Shiraishi wrote: > > Ah, in your defense ;-) I think you looked only at git-fetch.txt without > > checking where else this file is included. Then the patch certainly is > > understandable. It would probably make git-fetch.{1,html} easier to scan, > > while making things not worse for git-pull.{1,html} > > Can't we introduce subsections in the OPTIONS section to > group them together, like this (sorry, not a patch)? Yes, that was my first thought when reading this thread, too (sorry, no patch here, either. I need to sleep and then get on a plane). -Peff