From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nanako Shiraishi Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use fast-forward Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:07:09 +0900 Message-ID: <20091024220709.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> References: <1256373092-15126-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Michael J Gruber To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Oct 24 15:07:21 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N1gL2-00042e-M4 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:07:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753312AbZJXNHJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:07:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753321AbZJXNHH (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:07:07 -0400 Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33]:60145 "EHLO karen.lavabit.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753312AbZJXNHG (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:07:06 -0400 Received: from c.earth.lavabit.com (c.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.12]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486D011BB48; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:07:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 8748.lavabit.com (customer-148-233-239-23.uninet.net.mx [148.233.239.23]) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id YO30N2651D5P; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:07:11 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=3cjCyCjf/ndxqB/vfxdt/lIMPvsXdawRhjDVbKADbVQIVYYEThqMfM9PoOHrqMQar+YvEvM3+VNi5PRPWF80AuxOTzoUs0QH/lIcIQQrw9Eyha4jgU6A84H9blA7RvHbbg94WXZKR72O7yI8OspAs5hRvhlaOIyhBFlW73JocO8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id; In-Reply-To: <1256373092-15126-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Quoting Felipe Contreras > As suggested in the mailing list, now I've replaced all instances of 'fast > forward' with 'fast-forward'. I had an impression that the consensus from the previous discussion was that there is no such consensus that this is an improvement, because there isn't a clear-cut rule? -- Nanako Shiraishi http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/