From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Add I18N-wrappers for low-level IO-routines Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:08:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20091027210817.GA1577@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1256651643-18382-1-git-send-email-timur@iris-comp.ru> <1256651643-18382-2-git-send-email-timur@iris-comp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Timur Sufiev X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 27 22:08:28 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N2tHF-0000l1-MA for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:08:26 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932358AbZJ0VIP (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:08:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932312AbZJ0VIP (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:08:15 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:55393 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932303AbZJ0VIO (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:08:14 -0400 Received: (qmail 4050 invoked by uid 107); 27 Oct 2009 21:11:58 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (216.239.45.19) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:11:58 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:08:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1256651643-18382-2-git-send-email-timur@iris-comp.ru> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 04:54:01PM +0300, Timur Sufiev wrote: > Signed-off-by: Timur Sufiev Hmm. Two questions about this series: 1. Patch 3/4 didn't seem to make it to the list. Presumably that is where you actually use these routines in git? Or are they just for mingw? 2. I seem to recall that Linus added a filename translation layer for doing much more, like handling unicode normalizations (but I confess I haven't looked closely at that code). Should this be part of that system? -Peff