From: Charles Bailey <charles@hashpling.org>
To: Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail.com>, Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Cc: git list <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mergetool--lib: add p4merge as a pre-configured mergetool option
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:12:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091029221234.GB32590@hashpling.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d411cc4a0910281439v3388c243v42b3700f73744623@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 02:39:32PM -0700, Scott Chacon wrote:
> p4merge is now a built-in diff/merge tool.
> This adds p4merge to git-completion and updates
> the documentation to mention p4merge.
>
> Signed-Off-By: Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> This is the same patch, but I tested it on Linux as well as Mac and it
> works fine as long as the [difftool|mergetool].p4merge.path configs
> are set or it's in your path.
I've examined the two patches and I feel more comfortable with
Scott's, mainly due to it's simplicity.
I'm not sure I understand why only p4merge on Mac OS X is special, we
don't seem to treat any other mergetool specially and we don't seem to
need absolute paths anywhere else.
If it's a Mac OS X only thing, can we (and should we) avoid special
treatment for p4merge on other platforms?
The only other question I have is what are the merits of using
/dev/null as the base vs. a second copy of the local version in the
baseless merge case? It's the only other difference between the two
p4merge patches that I noticed.
Perhaps we could consider having both p4merge and launchp4merge as
separate options?
--
Charles Bailey
http://ccgi.hashpling.plus.com/blog/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-29 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-27 22:36 [PATCH] mergetool--lib: add p4merge as a pre-configured mergetool option Scott Chacon
2009-10-27 23:00 ` Charles Bailey
2009-10-28 7:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-28 9:00 ` David Aguilar
2009-10-28 15:37 ` Scott Chacon
2009-10-28 21:39 ` Scott Chacon
2009-10-28 23:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-29 6:17 ` Jay Soffian
2009-10-29 22:12 ` Charles Bailey [this message]
2009-10-30 0:47 ` Jay Soffian
2009-10-30 1:02 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-10-30 3:00 ` Jay Soffian
2009-10-30 10:35 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-10-30 11:25 ` Reece Dunn
2009-10-30 15:17 ` Jay Soffian
2009-10-30 15:30 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-10-30 17:44 ` Charles Bailey
2009-10-30 18:54 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091029221234.GB32590@hashpling.org \
--to=charles@hashpling.org \
--cc=davvid@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jaysoffian@gmail.com \
--cc=schacon@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).