From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] increase user-friendliness Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:29:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20091030182916.GB19901@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20091029002229.GA986@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 30 19:30:17 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N3wEq-0007LR-FF for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:30:16 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932862AbZJ3S3c (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:29:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932875AbZJ3S3W (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:29:22 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:60338 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932869AbZJ3S3U (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:29:20 -0400 Received: (qmail 2084 invoked by uid 107); 30 Oct 2009 18:33:05 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:33:05 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:29:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:59:35AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Jeff King wrote: > > > Git has a reputation as being unfriendly to users. Let's fix that by > > adding some features implemented by more user-friendly programs. > > So the bar for pirate patches has been raised to patch series now? Well, I wasn't intending to do a series, but strangely when you ask in a room full of git developers, "what ridiculous joke patch would you like me to code this afternoon?", you get way more answers than you wanted. I had to start rejecting suggestions. ;) -Peff PS Thanks to all who responded with ridiculous suggestions in your reviews. I'm not going to bother keeping the thread alive by responding to each, though. :)