From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Bug#553296: gitignore broken completely Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:43:33 -0400 Message-ID: <20091030194333.GA4551@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20091029233458.GA32764@ikki.ethgen.de> <20091030162857.26604.qmail@67b7e3b41a17c8.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <20091030165903.GA10671@ikki.ethgen.de> <20091030173838.GB18583@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vaaz8lleg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Klaus Ethgen , 553296@bugs.debian.org, git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 30 20:43:52 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N3xNz-0005hZ-AY for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:43:47 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756855AbZJ3Tnh (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:43:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756246AbZJ3Tnh (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:43:37 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:47795 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754077AbZJ3Tng (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:43:36 -0400 Received: (qmail 2682 invoked by uid 107); 30 Oct 2009 19:47:21 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:47:21 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:43:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vaaz8lleg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:41:27PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I've never understood the use of "ls-files -i" without -o, so in that > sense, I have done 2. myself already long time ago. > > In other words, I do not really care that much, and the choice would be > between "0. do not do anything---the patch in question was a bugfix for > longstanding insanity" and your "4. -i without -o didn't make much sense > but now it does and here is the new meaning". OK, I think the patch I sent elsewhere in the thread should be applied, then, as it should make you, me, and Klaus happy. -Peff