From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Bug#553296: gitignore broken completely Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:52:16 -0400 Message-ID: <20091030195216.GA27135@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20091029233458.GA32764@ikki.ethgen.de> <20091030162857.26604.qmail@67b7e3b41a17c8.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <20091030165903.GA10671@ikki.ethgen.de> <20091030173838.GB18583@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20091030182331.GC10671@ikki.ethgen.de> <20091030184155.GC19901@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20091030190552.GA3528@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vvdhwk6dq.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Klaus Ethgen , 553296@bugs.debian.org, git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 30 20:52:33 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N3xWR-00018N-Uw for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:52:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757377AbZJ3TwV (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:52:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757367AbZJ3TwV (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:52:21 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:54874 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757305AbZJ3TwU (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:52:20 -0400 Received: (qmail 2812 invoked by uid 107); 30 Oct 2009 19:56:05 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:56:05 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:52:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vvdhwk6dq.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:51:13PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Here it is. I think this is the right thing to do. Junio? > > I am not sure; my head spins when I see "tracked but ignored" (you have > a new one in the test) which is quite a bogus concept. > > Does it mean "tracked but would be ignored if it weren't---perhaps it was > added by mistake?"? Yes, that is exactly what it means. -Peff