From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] git send-email: Make --no-chain-reply-to the default
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:29:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091110182942.GA15677@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091110071927.GB11942@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> * Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> > [Footnote]
> >
> > *1* To spell it out... The people who are in the "hate
> > chain-reply-to very much" camp would have already done their own
> > configuration to get the behaviour they want by now, so changing the
> > default would not help them much, while potentially hurting "love
> > chain-reply-to" people who have been content because they got what
> > they wanted without setting any configuration.
>
> Stupid question: i researched the Git mailing list archive (and read
> the link you provided) and found no arguments (at all) in favor of the
> nested chaining. Are you aware of any?
Btw., dont get me wrong - i'm perfectly happy with the fix in 1.7.0. You
are also right that behavioral changes dont belong into stable releases.
( I'm just seeing this problem through the biased eyes of someone who is
affected by it, so i naturally want to have the benefit of the change
ASAP - without fully perceiving the risks of the change.)
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-10 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1257786206-9208-1-git-send-email-mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
[not found] ` <1257789555.4108.348.camel@laptop>
2009-11-10 4:08 ` [RFC, PATCH] git send-email: Make --no-chain-reply-to the default Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 5:12 ` Jay Soffian
2009-11-10 5:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 6:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-10 5:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-10 7:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 18:29 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-11-10 7:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-10 19:46 ` Michael Witten
2009-11-10 19:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091110182942.GA15677@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).