From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Sebrecht Subject: [PATCH] Re: Clarify documentation on the "ours" merge strategy. Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:30:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20091111213049.GJ27518@vidovic> References: <200911111411.nABEBfox031023@ds9.cixit.se> <2faad3050911110713y4e33c7d2h21ad42efe4fd70b3@mail.gmail.com> <200911112135.25839.trast@student.ethz.ch> <7vskckn5b4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Thomas Rast , Baz , Peter Krefting , Git Mailing List , Johannes Schindelin , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Steinbrink , Nicolas Sebrecht To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 11 22:31:02 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N8KmJ-00084L-SS for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:31:00 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758912AbZKKVat (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:30:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758865AbZKKVat (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:30:49 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.154]:47579 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758847AbZKKVas (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:30:48 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so622139fga.1 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:30:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8/Fr9fonc8T9HOWGcAfdV/z1S+cUl1kC9wFWxcxfCEw=; b=OFJGt45Nckvixnt7Diz6mszN8zWDZZiTg0CDnNxEGBVmPIxBUSLKGicv9HkekNPdpN GzRz55iOxsWk9vwRBlOQG2b9twL4tjStCSUXwFuED90z+RE42cT80SCgFmt2EZULSQn/ SfMKI/6xVErr/bZ8EO7ddNt3oEvpQrEcuInNs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=gs78+rP58Vjx5q42gKE2PmKzj1PnKOl8RbIyo3ZaaY4p8P2DfGfrPtajfr0OjCrNRd DuF1rVm1bQFpMkNPvT1sCOpTbuNGIwhgnd+Ueqwsz7+5KzD7wVdLBj+V2qJo2l4VTOWZ rR7ry8V865EVU/8TaFDi3jI2ENfQJHByu+xNc= Received: by 10.86.11.26 with SMTP id 26mr1460667fgk.72.1257975053334; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:30:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from @ (88-121-116-229.rev.libertysurf.net [88.121.116.229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e11sm11637812fga.22.2009.11.11.13.30.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:30:52 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vskckn5b4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: The 11/11/09, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Thomas Rast writes: > > > ++ > > +Because the sides in a rebase are swapped, using this strategy with > > +git-rebase is never a good idea. > > Looking very good. If this strategy is _never_ a good idea in this case, I tend to think that git should forbid this option, or at least, warn and refer to the documentation. -- Nicolas Sebrecht