git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
To: Baz <brian.ewins@gmail.com>
Cc: "Peter Krefting" <peter@softwolves.pp.se>,
	"Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	"Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clarify documentation on the "ours" merge strategy.
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:35:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911112135.25839.trast@student.ethz.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2faad3050911110713y4e33c7d2h21ad42efe4fd70b3@mail.gmail.com>

Baz wrote:
> 2009/11/11 Peter Krefting <peter@softwolves.pp.se>:
> >  ours::
> >        This resolves any number of heads, but the result of the
> > -       merge is always the current branch head.  It is meant to
> > +       merge is always the current branch head, discarding any
> > +       changes on the merged branch.  It is meant to
> 
> I think part of the problem is that it is unclear what the "current
> branch head" means when used in a rebase, and hence when this text is
> included in the help for git-rebase and git-pull.
[...]
> Perhaps something more in the way of an explicit warning?
> 
> ours::
>          This resolves any number of heads, but the result of the
>          merge is always the current branch head, discarding any
>          changes on the merged branch.  It is meant to
>          be used to supersede old development history of side
>          branches. Note that when rebasing, the branch you are
>          rebasing onto is the "current branch head", and using this
>          strategy will lose all of your changes - unlikely to be what
>          you wanted to do.

I'd much rather see this explained in the description of the rebase
-m/-s options since it (the swap) applies to all uses of 'git rebase
-m'.  Perhaps with an extra (but short) note in the "ours"
description, like so:

diff --git i/Documentation/git-rebase.txt w/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
index 33e0ef1..181947c 100644
--- i/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
+++ w/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
@@ -228,6 +228,10 @@ OPTIONS
 	Use merging strategies to rebase.  When the recursive (default) merge
 	strategy is used, this allows rebase to be aware of renames on the
 	upstream side.
++
+Note that in a rebase merge (hence merge conflict), the sides are
+swapped: "theirs" is the to-be-applied patch, and "ours" is the so-far
+rebased series, starting with <upstream>.
 
 -s <strategy>::
 --strategy=<strategy>::
diff --git i/Documentation/merge-strategies.txt w/Documentation/merge-strategies.txt
index 4365b7e..0cae1be 100644
--- i/Documentation/merge-strategies.txt
+++ w/Documentation/merge-strategies.txt
@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ ours::
 	merge is always the current branch head.  It is meant to
 	be used to supersede old development history of side
 	branches.
++
+Because the sides in a rebase are swapped, using this strategy with
+git-rebase is never a good idea.
 
 subtree::
 	This is a modified recursive strategy. When merging trees A and

-- 
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-11 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-02 12:26 git pull --rebase and losing commits Peter Krefting
2009-11-02 15:04 ` Thomas Rast
2009-11-02 21:34   ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-11-02 15:10 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-11-03  7:01   ` Peter Krefting
2009-11-03  9:52     ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-03 10:12       ` Peter Krefting
2009-11-11 14:03       ` [PATCH] Clarify documentation on the "ours" merge strategy Peter Krefting
2009-11-11 15:13         ` Baz
2009-11-11 20:35           ` Thomas Rast [this message]
2009-11-11 20:54             ` Baz
2009-11-11 21:02             ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-11 21:30               ` [PATCH] " Nicolas Sebrecht
2009-11-11 23:37                 ` Thomas Rast
2009-11-12  7:55                   ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-12  9:41                     ` Peter Krefting
2009-11-14  2:12                       ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-11-15  9:10                         ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-16  8:20                           ` Peter Krefting
2009-11-12  9:55                     ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-11-15 18:25                     ` [PATCH 0/3] Document and refuse rebase -s ours Thomas Rast
2009-11-15 18:25                       ` [PATCH 1/3] Documentation: clarify 'ours' merge strategy Thomas Rast
2009-11-15 18:25                       ` [PATCH 2/3] rebase docs: clarify --merge and --strategy Thomas Rast
2009-11-15 21:05                         ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-15 21:11                           ` Thomas Rast
2009-11-15 18:25                       ` [PATCH 3/3] rebase: refuse to rebase with -s ours Thomas Rast
2009-11-15 18:39                         ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-11-15 18:44                           ` Thomas Rast
2009-11-16 12:35                         ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-16 19:57                           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-16 21:25                             ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-16 21:45                               ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-16 22:04                                 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-11-16 23:04                               ` A Large Angry SCM
2009-11-15 21:04                       ` [PATCH 0/3] Document and refuse rebase " Junio C Hamano
2009-11-15 21:13                         ` Thomas Rast
2009-11-03 10:12     ` git pull --rebase and losing commits Thomas Rast
2009-11-03  4:27 ` Randal L. Schwartz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200911112135.25839.trast@student.ethz.ch \
    --to=trast@student.ethz.ch \
    --cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=brian.ewins@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter@softwolves.pp.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).