From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Wong Subject: Re: git-svn problem with v1.6.5 Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:11:21 -0800 Message-ID: <20091112071121.GA569@dcvr.yhbt.net> References: <4AF9E7FE.3060701@obry.net> <32541b130911101428t50038cfcsf37e3ea9edb26f64@mail.gmail.com> <4AFA91BB.7050402@obry.net> <32541b130911111141n7b029b1ep68656d2eb39be3c7@mail.gmail.com> <4AFB1756.7090708@obry.net> <20091111202201.GA10351@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20091111203413.GA9648@dcvr.yhbt.net> <4AFB32DC.50505@obry.net> <20091111224454.GA16178@dcvr.yhbt.net> <4AFBADA9.3060401@obry.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avery Pennarun , adambrewster@gmail.com, git list To: Pascal Obry X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 12 08:11:29 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N8Tq5-0007kr-3g for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:11:29 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751222AbZKLHLS (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:11:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751181AbZKLHLR (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:11:17 -0500 Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net ([64.71.152.64]:38261 "EHLO dcvr.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751103AbZKLHLR (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:11:17 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.2.5]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76521F679; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AFBADA9.3060401@obry.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Pascal Obry wrote: > Eric, > >> Did you try an early version of Adam's patch before it made it into >> git.git by any chance? > > No. > >> Or, did you by any chance start a fresh import with a v1.6.5 and then >> rsync $GIT_DIR to one created with 1.6.4 and not use --delete with >> rsync? > > No. The import has been done with 1.6.4. A filter-branch has been > applied to fix author names. But AFAIK (will check) it has been done > with 1.6.4 too. Oh... Any chance that lost commit you couldn't find was clobbered by filter-branch? That would explain a lot... -- Eric Wong