From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Wong Subject: Re: git-svn problem with v1.6.5 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:35:09 -0800 Message-ID: <20091112093509.GA617@dcvr.yhbt.net> References: <32541b130911111141n7b029b1ep68656d2eb39be3c7@mail.gmail.com> <4AFB1756.7090708@obry.net> <20091111202201.GA10351@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20091111203413.GA9648@dcvr.yhbt.net> <4AFB32DC.50505@obry.net> <20091111224454.GA16178@dcvr.yhbt.net> <4AFBADA9.3060401@obry.net> <20091112071121.GA569@dcvr.yhbt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avery Pennarun , adambrewster@gmail.com, git list To: Pascal Obry X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 12 10:35:21 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N8W5H-00017k-NL for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:35:20 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752634AbZKLJfG (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:35:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752608AbZKLJfF (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:35:05 -0500 Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net ([64.71.152.64]:37007 "EHLO dcvr.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752305AbZKLJfE (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:35:04 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.2.5]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169271F679; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:35:10 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Pascal Obry wrote: > Eric, > > > Will review the procedure for filtering branches :( > > A quick review does not show something obviously wrong on my side. > > The commit on the rewritten repo has a different sha-1 which is > expected. So to me it seems that after a filter-branch on a git-svn > repo it is mandatory to recreate all .rev_map*? Is that right? Is so, > this is the missing piece in the procedure on my side. Yes, you need to recreate all the .rev_map* files if you use filter-branch. Just remove them and they should be automatically recreated for your case (not using --no-metadata or --use-svm-props) -- Eric Wong